1962
DOI: 10.1007/bf02780363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-section measurement of (n, 2n) Reactions on 14.1 MeV neutrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 13.5-14.8 MeV energy range, our results are in agreement with Refs. [10,12,13,15,17,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25] and model calculations [43] within experimental uncertainty, while at neutron energy 13.5 MeV, our values are somewhat higher than those of Cevolani et al [16] and evaluated data in ENDF/B-VII.0 [49] and CENDL-3.1 [50]. 71 Ga(n, 2n) 70 Ga reaction.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In the 13.5-14.8 MeV energy range, our results are in agreement with Refs. [10,12,13,15,17,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25] and model calculations [43] within experimental uncertainty, while at neutron energy 13.5 MeV, our values are somewhat higher than those of Cevolani et al [16] and evaluated data in ENDF/B-VII.0 [49] and CENDL-3.1 [50]. 71 Ga(n, 2n) 70 Ga reaction.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Tables II and III list the average neutron energy in the laboratory system and the neutron-energy resolution corresponding to one-half the total neutron energy spread. Figure 1 shows a comparison of the F 19 (^,2#)F 18 crosssection measurements of the present experiment with the results of Rayburn, 12 Picard and Williamson, 13 Mc~ Crary and Morgan, 14 Cevolani and Petralia, 15 BrilF et al, u Ashby et al, 17 and Paul and Clarke. 18 There is excellent agreement between the present results and those of Rayburn.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In the 13 -15 MeV neutron energy range, the crosssections of the 79 Br((n, 2n)) 78 Br reaction were measured using various counting methods that have been reported in 14 publications [2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The measured cross-sections ranged from 710 to 1337 mb.…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for this inconsistency arises from using poor-resolution NaI(Tl) crystal and different types of detectors, such as Geiger-Mueller tubes (GEMUC) and plastic scintillators (SCIN) in γ-spectrometers, or using inconsistent decay data. For the 79 Br((n, 2n)) 78 Br reaction, the cross-sections were estimated by Paul and Clarke (1953) [6], Grimeland et al (1965) [8], and Minetti and Pasquarelli (1967) [9] using the beta particle counting method, Rayburn (1961) [7], Grimeland et al (1965) [8], Cevolani and Petralia (1962) [13], Carles (1963) [14], and Pansare and Bhoraskar (1993) [16] using annihilation radiation (AR), and Zhao et al (2009) [2], Rao et al (1971) [5], Okumura (1967) [10], Williams (1981) [12], and Sakane et al (2001) [17] using a 613 keV characteristic γ-ray of the 78 Br product radionuclide. In fact, 613 keV γ-rays are produced not only by the 78 Br nucleus but also the 78 As nucleus via the 81 Br((n, α)) 78 As reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%