2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2005.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-section crushing behaviour of hat-sections (Part I: Numerical modelling)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic angle θ of isosceles trapezium for H c = 4 mm and 8 mm is 63.4° and 66.4°, respectively. What should be noted here is that the corner radius of corrugated core is an important parameter to its crush behavior [31,32]. After measuring, it is found that the corner radius for current samples is around 1.5 mm for both two configurations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The basic angle θ of isosceles trapezium for H c = 4 mm and 8 mm is 63.4° and 66.4°, respectively. What should be noted here is that the corner radius of corrugated core is an important parameter to its crush behavior [31,32]. After measuring, it is found that the corner radius for current samples is around 1.5 mm for both two configurations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Mesh sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the number of elements. Hofmeyer [38][39] reported similar modelling technique for cross-section crushing behaviour of hat sections.…”
Section: Geometry and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, web crippling simulations required long computational times that could result in unfeasible simulations [14,26]. This was overcome with the advancements in computing and numerical modelling software in the late 1990s and early 2000s making therefore possible to conduct the first parametric studies successfully [27][28][29][30]. Since then, several research studies on cold-formed steel sections subjected to web crippling have been published with the aim to improve and extend the applicability of the empiric equations given in the above mentioned design standards with a focus on channel sections [31][32][33][34][35][36], channel sections with perforations [37][38][39][40] as well as proprietary beams [41] and SupaCee sections [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although material and geometrical nonlinearities make predictive design equations based on first principles hard to obtain, efforts were made to derive analytical models for the treatment of web crippling [11,14,28,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. These studies were based on traditional yield line mechanisms that combined with experimental observations were used to define web crippling collapse mechanisms and post buckling behaviour upon which to derive analytical equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%