2015
DOI: 10.1111/geb.12395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross‐scale integration of knowledge for predicting species ranges: a metamodelling framework

Abstract: Aim Current interest in forecasting changes to species ranges has resulted in a multitude of approaches to species distribution models (SDMs). However, most approaches include only a small subset of the available information, and many ignore smaller-scale processes such as growth, fecundity and dispersal. Furthermore, different approaches often produce divergent predictions with no simple method to reconcile them. Here, we present a flexible framework for integrating models at multiple scales using hierarchica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a framework would have the advantages of using the full range of data available, allowing for the filling in of temporal or spatial gaps, reducing the impacts of data limitations and biases, and quantifying the confidence in conclusions (Schaub and Abadi 2011, Pagel and Schurr 2012, Talluto et al 2016). At a minimum, this novel integrative modeling framework would need to: 1) cohesively and quantitatively combine data and understanding from different fields, 2) identify and model key processes, 3) quantify uncertainty in data and processes, and 4) be computationally tractable.…”
Section: Recent Advances Towards Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a framework would have the advantages of using the full range of data available, allowing for the filling in of temporal or spatial gaps, reducing the impacts of data limitations and biases, and quantifying the confidence in conclusions (Schaub and Abadi 2011, Pagel and Schurr 2012, Talluto et al 2016). At a minimum, this novel integrative modeling framework would need to: 1) cohesively and quantitatively combine data and understanding from different fields, 2) identify and model key processes, 3) quantify uncertainty in data and processes, and 4) be computationally tractable.…”
Section: Recent Advances Towards Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pagel and Schurr (2012) developed a Bayesian DRM composed of a sequence of conditional, probabilistic equations that describe abundance, detectability, dispersal, population growth, and the influence of the environment on carrying capacity. An alternative to a DRM is a hierarchical Bayesian metamodel that uses a mechanistic or correlative model to constrain an ENM using genetic, phenological, trait, pollen-vegetation, experimental, or other data (Talluto et al 2016). pollen).…”
Section: Advance 3 Truly Integrative Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the framework outlined in Talluto et al (2016), which operates by first constructing an SDM using occurrence and environmental data (hereafter "naïve SDMs", indicating that they are informed only by presence-absence data), and by then further informing the parameters of this model using sub-models that relate species performance to the same variables used to calibrate the SDM. Here, we build SDMs using occurrences of adult trees, and then further constrain these with sub-models using data for seedlings at two different scales, considering (a) seedling survival using smaller-scale experimental results and (b) seedling recruitment dynamics, using data from the FIA.…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was accomplished by simulating presence-absence datasets y recruitment and y survival following Talluto et al (2016). This was accomplished by simulating presence-absence datasets y recruitment and y survival following Talluto et al (2016).…”
Section: Species Distribution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation