Abstract:The toxicity of fipronil to insecticide-susceptible houseflies and the cross-resistance potential of fipronil were determined for six insecticide-resistant laboratory housefly strains by topical application and feeding bioassay. The insecticide-resistant strains represented different levels and patterns of resistance to pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates and organochlorines. Five strains were almost susceptible to fipronil in feeding bioassay with resistance factors at LC50 between 0.36 and 3.0. Four of… Show more
“…Recently, there have been a few reports of C. suppressalis with low or middle level of resistance to fipronil in the field (Cao et al 2004; Jing et al 2005). In fact, high levels of fipronil resistance have been monitored in many other insects such as Plutella xylostella, Musca domestica, Oulema oryzae and Drosophila simulans (Sayyed et al 2004; Kristensen et al 2004; Ueno et al 2005). The mutation of Rdl genes was responsible for conferring high level of fipronil resistance in D. simulans (Goff et al 2005).…”
Using the phenylpyrazole insecticide, fipronil for selection in the laboratory, a resistant Wenzhou strain of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) had an LD50 at least 45.3 times greater than the susceptible Anhui strain. The realized resistant heritability (h2) of 0.213 showed that the tolerant phenotype was moderately heritable and had potential to develop higher tolerance to fipronil. Piperonyl butoxide decreased the effects of fipronil on the mortality of the susceptible larvae with 0.27–0.44 times synergistic rates, but increased the toxicity of fipronil on the resistant larvae with 1.85–2.53 times synergistic rates as compared to that of fipronil alone. The inhibitory effect of piperonyl butoxide on the activity of microsomal O-demethylase was greater in susceptible larvae than in the resistant larvae. The differential synergism of fipronil by piperonyl butoxide in the susceptible and resistant C. suppressalis may be caused by the reduced penetration of fipronil in the lab-selected Wenzhou strain.
“…Recently, there have been a few reports of C. suppressalis with low or middle level of resistance to fipronil in the field (Cao et al 2004; Jing et al 2005). In fact, high levels of fipronil resistance have been monitored in many other insects such as Plutella xylostella, Musca domestica, Oulema oryzae and Drosophila simulans (Sayyed et al 2004; Kristensen et al 2004; Ueno et al 2005). The mutation of Rdl genes was responsible for conferring high level of fipronil resistance in D. simulans (Goff et al 2005).…”
Using the phenylpyrazole insecticide, fipronil for selection in the laboratory, a resistant Wenzhou strain of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) had an LD50 at least 45.3 times greater than the susceptible Anhui strain. The realized resistant heritability (h2) of 0.213 showed that the tolerant phenotype was moderately heritable and had potential to develop higher tolerance to fipronil. Piperonyl butoxide decreased the effects of fipronil on the mortality of the susceptible larvae with 0.27–0.44 times synergistic rates, but increased the toxicity of fipronil on the resistant larvae with 1.85–2.53 times synergistic rates as compared to that of fipronil alone. The inhibitory effect of piperonyl butoxide on the activity of microsomal O-demethylase was greater in susceptible larvae than in the resistant larvae. The differential synergism of fipronil by piperonyl butoxide in the susceptible and resistant C. suppressalis may be caused by the reduced penetration of fipronil in the lab-selected Wenzhou strain.
“…Moreover, the known tolerance of some insect predators to imidacloprid is advantageous concerning the safety of non-target organisms [37]. Fipronil, a broad spectrum phenylpyrazole, is highly toxic to dipterans including dairy populations of house flies [38], malarial and dengue mosquitoes [32], and fruit flies [39]. Although, fipronil will have a potential to control house flies in the future [38], baits containing fipronil should be evaluated at livestock farms under varying environmental conditions.…”
House flies (Diptera: Muscidae), potential vectors of a variety of pathogens, characteristically search and feed on sugar sources just after emergence for their survival. Phagostimulants like sugars, and visual characteristics of feeding materials play an important role in foraging success in house flies. Therefore, development of toxic baits by using the combination of phagostimulant and visual lure may prove effective in localized control of house flies. In the present study, visual attraction of house flies to different fabric colors was studied in choice and no choice experiments. Dark blue was the most preferred color in both experiments. In toxicity experiments, insecticide solutions were prepared in 20% sugar solution. Dark blue fabric strips were prepared by moistening with 20% sugar water solution containing median lethal concentrations of one of the four insecticides viz., fipronil, Imidacloprid, indoxacarb and Spinosad. The fabric strips treated with fipronil and Imidacloprid took minimum time (7.66 and 7.81 h, respectively) to cause 50% mortality, while those treated with Spinosad and indoxacarb took relatively more time (13.62 and 17.91 h, respectively) to cause 50% mortality. In conclusion, the combination of phagostimulant and visual lure could be used in designing toxic baits for house flies.
“…However, due to the increased frequency and years of use, fipronil resistance started to appear in insects 28,29 . Many studies reported fipronil re-sistance in various insect pests such as rice stem borer, house fly, and diamondback moth [29][30][31][32] . In this study we found that the average LC 50 values from toxicity tests of fipronil against RLF population collected from conventional paddy field was 63.3 ppm (Table 2), which is comparable to that of a previous study in Sri Lanka in 2001 that reported the LC 50 values of 60 ppm for the same insect and insecticide 33 .…”
Section: Toxicity Of Fipronil Against Rice Insect Pestmentioning
ABSTRACT:The relationship between weather and rice leaffolder population in Kamphaeng Phet and Phichit provinces, Thailand from February 2013 to February 2014 was evaluated. The results showed that the numbers of rice leaffolder larvae were significantly correlated with maximum temperature (r = 0.474) and average temperature (r = 0.375). Increasing temperature within the upper threshold of the species generally promoted insect population growth. Although statistically non-significant, relative humidity and rainfall produced negative correlation with rice leaffolder population (r = −0.249 and −0.091, respectively). Both factors might reduce leaffolder population via promoting activity of microbial control agents and physically dislodging eggs and larvae of rice leaffolder. When the insecticide fipronil was tested against populations of rice leaffolder in conventional and organic paddy fields, the lethal concentration (LC 50 ) value from toxicity tests with a population from a conventional field was significantly higher than with that of the organic field (63.3 versus 51.1 ppm). With continued and prolonged use of fipronil in a rice field, there is a tendency of that rice leaffolder to develop resistance to this insecticide. Resistance management and resistance monitoring should to be seriously considered if effective control is desired.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.