2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Reactivity to Cephalosporins and Carbapenems in Penicillin-Allergic Patients: Two Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
31
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…All BL compounds can potentially induce a specific immunological response and, due to their wide prescription, BL allergy is nowadays a worldwide health issue with relevant implications [43][44][45]. One of the main issues is establishing the risk of developing an allergic reaction to cephalosporins prescribed in patients previously diagnosed of penicillin IHR, with different unsolved questions like if this risk can be predicted by ST and/or DPT, or the role of the chemical structure, specifically the side chain, in this recognition [10,[46][47][48][49]. The main difficulty is that, despite efforts [28][29][30], the antigenic determinants of cephalosporins are unknown [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All BL compounds can potentially induce a specific immunological response and, due to their wide prescription, BL allergy is nowadays a worldwide health issue with relevant implications [43][44][45]. One of the main issues is establishing the risk of developing an allergic reaction to cephalosporins prescribed in patients previously diagnosed of penicillin IHR, with different unsolved questions like if this risk can be predicted by ST and/or DPT, or the role of the chemical structure, specifically the side chain, in this recognition [10,[46][47][48][49]. The main difficulty is that, despite efforts [28][29][30], the antigenic determinants of cephalosporins are unknown [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 There are few prospective studies of β-lactam-allergic subjects which assessed cross-reactivity among β-lactams by carrying out allergy tests with β-lactams other than those responsible and, in case of negative results, by performing graded challenges with them. 4,[9][10][11][12] Penicillin-Allergic Subjects Individuals with histories of penicillin allergy are more likely to receive alternative broad-spectrum antibiotics, including vancomycin and quinolones, which can lead to higher costs, prolonged hospitalizations, and elevated number of infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium difficile). [15][16][17] Although a large number of patients are labeled as allergic to penicillin, more than 95% of them can tolerate penicillin after an appropriate evaluation.…”
Section: Selecting Alternative β-Lactams In β-Lactam-allergic Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, side chains contribute significantly to immunological recognition and therefore the structures are most frequently responsible for allergic cross-reactivity. 1,[7][8][9][10][11][12] In β-lactam-allergic patients, the diagnostic workup with alternative drugs shows the cross-reactivity and, above all, allows to treat patients with safe drugs. 4,13 This review is mainly about prospective studies which assessed the cross-reactivity among β-lactams in penicillin-or cephalosporin-allergic subjects by carrying out in vivo tests and, if available, in vitro ones with alternative β-lactams and, in case of negative results, administering them via graded challenges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of cross-reactivity between beta-lactams in the context of delayed hypersensitivities, 18.7-31.2% of the patients tested presented a reaction to amino-penicillins and amino-cephalosporins (Dash, 1975) predicted by the presence of shared R1 and R2 side chains (Buonomo et al, 2014;Romano et al, 2016). Also, in patients with a delayed penicillin type reaction, delayed IDT to beta-lactams has allowed to confirm tolerance to cephalosporins (Picard et al, 2019;Trubiano et al, 2020), carbapenems (Gaeta et al, 2015;Picard et al, 2019) and monobactams (Buonomo et al, 2011). Other classes of interest are currently being studies with no evidence of cross-reactivity such as glycopeptides (Empedrad et al, 2003a), antibiotic and non-antibiotic sulfonamides (Empedrad et al, 2003a;Lammintausta and Kortekangas-Savolainen, 2005), drugs in the rifampin class (Lammintausta and Kortekangas-Savolainen, 2005) and aromatic and non-aromatic anticonvulsants (Heinzerling et al, 2013).…”
Section: Intradermal Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putting aside the demanding and time-consuming laboratory manipulations and the use of radioactivity and specialist equipment, the LTT can be an interesting support in drug hypersensitivity diagnosis but is still only used as a research tool (Pichler and Tilch, 2004;Nagao-Dias et al, 2009). The largest study describes LTT in 923 patients with suspected hypersensitivity among which only 100 patients had a confirmed drug hypersensitivity reaction and 58/78 penicillin allergy labeled patients presented a positive LTT (Picard et al, 2019). In the last 10 years, aside from case reports or small cases series (Kim et al, 2013;Cabanas et al, 2014;Dias de Castro et al, 2015;Tomida et al, 2016), very few studies have focused solely on the LTT method for diagnosis.…”
Section: Lymphocyte Transformation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%