1987
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/156.1.183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Reactivity in Serological Tests for Lyme Disease and Other Spirochetal Infections

Abstract: Serum specimens from 163 persons with Lyme disease, tick-borne or louse-borne relapsing fever, yaws, syphilis, leptospirosis, or Rocky Mountain spotted fever were analyzed to assess the specificity of indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) tests, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and microscopic agglutination (MA) procedures. Strong cross-reactivity occurred when sera from individuals with Lyme disease, tick-borne relapsing fever, and louse-borne relapsing fever were tested against heterologous Borrel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
167
0
5

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
167
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross-reactivity occurred in both tests with sera from human patients with other spirochetal diseases, because the causative organisms are taxonomically related and common antigens have been described for various spirochetes (12). It can not be a diagnostic problem with canine leptospirosis, because cross-reactivity is not a diagnostic problem with leptospiral infection in man.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cross-reactivity occurred in both tests with sera from human patients with other spirochetal diseases, because the causative organisms are taxonomically related and common antigens have been described for various spirochetes (12). It can not be a diagnostic problem with canine leptospirosis, because cross-reactivity is not a diagnostic problem with leptospiral infection in man.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All HGE patients in the second and third groups had thrombocytopenia or leukopenia; serum samples were obtained 3-5 weeks after onset of illness. To further assess specificities, human sera were also selected from frozen collections representing the following study groups: syphilis (24 serum samples), louse-borne relapsing fever (11), acute necrotising ulcerative gingivitis or periodontitis (6), and rheumatoid arthritis (7). Clinical findings, sources of sera and serological reactivities for the specimens in these four groups have been reported previously [6,9].…”
Section: Study Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficulties associated with the sensitivities and specificities of these assays, inter-laboratory discrepancies due to nonstandardised tests, complications due to co-migration of proteins of similar molecular masses in blots, and higher costs of performing immunoblot analyses are important limitations. Moreover, the use of whole-cell, sonicated antigens of B. burgdorferi in ELISAs can yield false positive results [6,7] due to cross-reactivity of antibodies to treponemes or other bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sera were diluted 1:320 to reduce crossreactivity with heterologous antibodies. 7,[29][30][31][32] The antigen used in the ELISA was a heat-killed, sonicated B. burgdorferi spirochete suspension (Kirkegaard and Perry, Gaithersburg, MD) diluted 1:100 in carbonate-bicarbonate coating buffer (27.6 mM Na 2 CO 3 , 19 mM NaHCO 3 , pH 9.6). Test sera were diluted in blocking buffer (5% wt/vol blotting grade dehydrated milk [Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA] in phosphate-buffered saline).…”
Section: Sample Population Counties In Wisconsinmentioning
confidence: 99%