2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-022-00984-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-national public acceptance of sustainable global supply chain policy instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The newer requirements provide more detail of what actions should be undertaken (e.g. identify risks, dependencies and impacts) and are in line with due diligence approaches that incorporate own activities and those along value chains [ 26 , 27 ]. Such requirements reflect the kinds of decisions companies are making with respect to biodiversity, for example, recognizing that companies depend upon nature because it is the source of raw materials and also buffers company direct and indirect impacts.…”
Section: Company Decision-making Through Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newer requirements provide more detail of what actions should be undertaken (e.g. identify risks, dependencies and impacts) and are in line with due diligence approaches that incorporate own activities and those along value chains [ 26 , 27 ]. Such requirements reflect the kinds of decisions companies are making with respect to biodiversity, for example, recognizing that companies depend upon nature because it is the source of raw materials and also buffers company direct and indirect impacts.…”
Section: Company Decision-making Through Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the choice experiment exposed respondents to a very wide range of randomly generated treatments, it is highly unlikely that the results in the subsequent vignette experiment, on which most of the present paper is based, could be affected by systematic carryover effects (Clifford, Sheagley, and Piston, 2021). In another paper, we analyze the choice experimental data to gauge public support levels for stricter supply chain governance, using standard statistical tools for choice experiment analysis (Kolcava, Smith, and Bernauer, 2022). In the present paper, however, we rather adopt the choice-experimental data as a supplement to the data collected in the vignette experiment.…”
Section: Data Generation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on the case of disclosure-based policy measures aimed at improving environmental and working conditions throughout global production networks (Sellare, Börner, Brugger et al, 2022). Recent research has quantified citizen preferences within the Global North, broadly noting high levels of concern for global sustainability inequality, as well as support for corporate and governmental interventions in this area (Kolcava, Smith, and Bernauer, 2022;Amengual and Bartley, 2022). Indeed, policy-makers across several highincome economies (several in Europe, United States, Australia, Japan) are debating and recently have adopted policy frameworks towards improving the sustainability of global supply chains .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public opinion has been consistently demonstrated to have a strong influence on governmental actors’ priorities and ensuing policy output across wide-ranging democratic contexts 19 , 20 . Recent findings indicate high support for stringent supply chain policies in high-income OECD countries 21 , largely driven by demands to make overseas production practices match ethical expectations 22 , 23 and the desire to adjust domestic policy to international norm-setting 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, individual-level environmental concern and perceived impacts of environmental problems will be positively associated with support for more stringent policies 27 . Lastly, supply chain policy preferences will be robust against information provided about potential costs and benefits associated with these measures 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%