Cross‐National Concepts in Supranational Governance: State–Society Relations and EU Policy Making

Abstract

The emergence of multiple and shifting modes of governance both intranationally and supranationally has posed difficulties for analysts accustomed to refining or testing singular types of politics. When confronted with this changing complexity, a comprehensive framework can be a very useful diagnostic and organizational tool. This article devises one such conceptual framework to clarify and systematize varieties of state autonomy and state-society relations. By combining fundamental conceptions of action, elemental control mechanisms, and basic types of interaction, a comprehensive framework is constructed for characterizing and comparing governance modes in a conceptually coherent manner. Many of the abstract spaces within this conceptual field share affinities with types of state autonomy and state-society relations depicted in major theoretical approaches to national politics (i.e., authoritarianism, statism, pluralism, corporatism, institutionalism, and Marxism). This article uses this conceptual framework to systematize these major governance modes and to illuminate their coexistence in supranational governance by examining the European Union policy process.

Governing for sustainability: How research on large and complex systems can inform governance and institutional theory

“…It has, for example, travelled to the field international politics, looking for solutions to anarchy in the international system (Rosenau & Czempiel, 1992;Yee, 2004). It has, for example, travelled to the field international politics, looking for solutions to anarchy in the international system (Rosenau & Czempiel, 1992;Yee, 2004).…”

Cursed by Oil? Rural Threats, Agricultural Policy Changes and the Impact of Oil on Indonesia's and Nigeria's Rural Development

“…State autonomy is either hampered or facilitated by society. Conceptualizing state autonomy in a unidirectional way—especially in terms of the strength of the state—downplays the mutual effects of the state and society (Yee, , p. 493). Yet, in line with this argument, society needs to be understood broadly to cover not only business or interest groups but also other societal actors, such as peasant organizations or other types of popular pressures.…”

Achieving Dynamism in an Anaemic Europe

“…The structural framework determines the magnitude to which benefits can be expected to derive from the process. It is often argued that unless the number of 50 Falkner (1998), Lavdas (2005, Ottaway (2001), Smismans (2004), Yee (2004). 51 Smismans (2003) and Compston (2003).…”