2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-national comparison of gender differences in the enrollment in and completion of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics Massive Open Online Courses

Abstract: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have the potential to democratize education by providing learners with access to high-quality free online courses. However, evidence supporting this democratization across countries is limited. We explored the question of MOOC democratization by conducting cross-national comparisons of gender differences in the enrollment in and completion of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) MOOCs. We found that while females were less likely than males to enroll in S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, by drawing on the issue of gender differences in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education in particular, this view is also supported by [20] who note that gender disparity is rampant at STEM MOOCs, as only one in five learners is female (consisting of 20%). In [17] the authors pinpoint that a percentage of female's overall enrolment of STEM MOOCs is considerably lower than males (females: 24.16%), but the completion rate in STEM MOOC is appeared to be equal (females: 3.06%; males: 3.11%). Some probable reasons emerged from this, that females' underrepresentation in STEM MOOC is due to the lack of access to the Internet; gender stereotypes; or inadequate awareness of STEM learning opportunities.…”
Section: Gender Disparitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, by drawing on the issue of gender differences in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education in particular, this view is also supported by [20] who note that gender disparity is rampant at STEM MOOCs, as only one in five learners is female (consisting of 20%). In [17] the authors pinpoint that a percentage of female's overall enrolment of STEM MOOCs is considerably lower than males (females: 24.16%), but the completion rate in STEM MOOC is appeared to be equal (females: 3.06%; males: 3.11%). Some probable reasons emerged from this, that females' underrepresentation in STEM MOOC is due to the lack of access to the Internet; gender stereotypes; or inadequate awareness of STEM learning opportunities.…”
Section: Gender Disparitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a considerable literature has grown around MOOCs that accentuate that MOOCs may significantly contribute to democratizing higher education by opening doors to learning and employment opportunities [15][16][17]. Along with this opportunism, however, results from earlier studies demonstrate that MOOCs can adversely affect educational equity under certain socio-economic and cultural status, confirming that the majority of MOOC learners are young, highly trained males from more developed countries [18][19][20].…”
Section: Reflections and The Way Forward: Sustaining A Culture Of Excmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En un análisis sobre los MOOCs ofertados de materias STEM, el 72% de las matrículas realizadas en España eran de hombres y el 28% de mujeres. De ellos, terminan satisfactoriamente el curso el 9,36% de los hombres y el 21,5% de las mujeres (Jiang, 2018). La cuestión es paradójica porque, en dos tercios de los países analizados, las alumnas son iguales o mejores a los chicos en ciencias, pero a mayor índice de igualdad del país, menor porcentaje de alumnas en carreras STEM (Stoet & Geary, 2018).…”
Section: Brecha En Los Estudios Stemunclassified
“…Numerous studies address the various factors related to the preference for enrollement in undergraduate studies (Korkmaz 2015;Wright 2017;Rodríguez et al 2018;Jiang et al 2018;Kuba et al 2018;Fernandes 2018). Korkmaz (2015) mentions that multiple studies have been conducted concerning the professional aspirations of adolescents in different cultures, finding some common intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence career choice.…”
Section: Category 3 Factors Associated With the Demand For Engineerimentioning
confidence: 99%