2019
DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2019.1572729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-modal working memory binding and learning of visual-phonological associations in children with reading difficulties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that it supports critical reading-related subskills such as selective attention, rhythm perception, phonological awareness, and auditory working memory including verbal memory encoding and recall. In our intervention, it is likely that there was a strong involvement of working memory in supporting the learning of visual-auditory cross-modal associations; it may be that cross-modal 'binding' may help to explain the observed effect in the word recognition task (Garcia et al, 2019;Toffalini et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that it supports critical reading-related subskills such as selective attention, rhythm perception, phonological awareness, and auditory working memory including verbal memory encoding and recall. In our intervention, it is likely that there was a strong involvement of working memory in supporting the learning of visual-auditory cross-modal associations; it may be that cross-modal 'binding' may help to explain the observed effect in the word recognition task (Garcia et al, 2019;Toffalini et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…What is not clear from the extant literature is what part learning to read music whilst learning an instrument, as opposed to playing by ear, plays in this observed improvement in working memory. The concept of working memory 'binding' cross-modal information (in this case audio and visual) may provide a clue to the involvement of working memory in the maintenance and learning of crossmodal associations (Garcia et al, 2019;Toffalini et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a few studies have not found an association between working memory and reading comprehension (Muijselaar and de Jong, 2015 ), a result that may depend on the fact that updating while reading is a far more demanding task than updating as assessed by standardized tests. Fewer studies investigated visuospatial working memory notwithstanding the literature points to the relevance of cross-modal working memory in reading task (Garcia et al, 2019 ) and to the role of visuospatial deficits in text comprehension impairment (Mammarella et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some struggle to form novel audiovisual mappings, a difficulty that can persist well into adulthood (Blau et al, 2009;Jones et al, 2013bJones et al, , 2018. Readers with developmental dyslexia exhibit indications of less-integrated grapheme-phoneme representations (Blau et al, 2009(Blau et al, , 2010Blomert, 2011;Warmington and Hulme, 2012;Aravena et al, 2013Aravena et al, , 2018Žarić et al, 2015), a deficit owing in part to their comparatively poorer cross-modal binding skills (Aravena et al, 2013;Jones et al, 2013bJones et al, , 2018Žarić et al, 2015;Albano et al, 2016;Toffalini et al, 2018Toffalini et al, , 2019Garcia et al, 2019). Despite the well-known link between audiovisual integration and ultimate reading attainment, the cognitive mechanisms underlying typical and atypical cross-modal binding ability are not yet fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of accuracy, we predicted that, compared with typical readers, readers with dyslexia would show generally higher error rates, and a shallower function of learning (Messbauer and de Jong, 2003;Aravena et al, 2013;Jones et al, 2013bJones et al, , 2018Albano et al, 2016;Toffalini et al, 2018Toffalini et al, , 2019Garcia et al, 2019). Further, whilst we predicted that consistently presenting targets in the same spatial location and/or in the context of the same alternatives would generally decrease error rates, we suspected that these consistency effects would disproportionately benefit readers with dyslexia: though previous work indicates that readers with dyslexia are less likely to track single-feature statistics (e.g., location) over multiple exposures (Jones et al, 2013b(Jones et al, , 2018Toffalini et al, 2018), providing both spatial (i.e., item screen location) and contextual consistencies (i.e., item co-occurrences) might prove particularly advantageous to help impaired readers bootstrap degraded representations/poorer retrieval of individual items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%