1999
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1998.1996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Modal Priming Evidence for Phonology-to-Orthography Activation in Visual Word Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the results of Experiment 2, Connine et al (1993) have shown that pseudo-words can prime phonological word neighbors as long as the phonological distance between the two does not exceed one or two phonetic features (see also: Milberg et al, 1988; Marslen-Wilson et al, 1996; Frisch et al, 2000; Bölte and Coenen, 2002; Saito et al, 2003; Raettig and Kotz, 2008; Gow, 2012). The claim that lexical orthography may be automatically activated during spoken word processing is also supported by a variety of studies (e.g., Whatmough et al, 1999; Ziegler et al, 2003; Ventura et al, 2004). In this study, we have extended the implications of these claims to the context of spelling to dictation, and have adopted the further assumption that both lexical and sublexical processes, operating in parallel, activate a common set of graphemes (see also: Tainturier and Rapp, 2001, 2004; Rapp et al, 2002; Bosse et al, 2003; Bonin and Delattre, 2010; Purcell et al, 2011; Martin and Barry, 2012; Roux et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Consistent with the results of Experiment 2, Connine et al (1993) have shown that pseudo-words can prime phonological word neighbors as long as the phonological distance between the two does not exceed one or two phonetic features (see also: Milberg et al, 1988; Marslen-Wilson et al, 1996; Frisch et al, 2000; Bölte and Coenen, 2002; Saito et al, 2003; Raettig and Kotz, 2008; Gow, 2012). The claim that lexical orthography may be automatically activated during spoken word processing is also supported by a variety of studies (e.g., Whatmough et al, 1999; Ziegler et al, 2003; Ventura et al, 2004). In this study, we have extended the implications of these claims to the context of spelling to dictation, and have adopted the further assumption that both lexical and sublexical processes, operating in parallel, activate a common set of graphemes (see also: Tainturier and Rapp, 2001, 2004; Rapp et al, 2002; Bosse et al, 2003; Bonin and Delattre, 2010; Purcell et al, 2011; Martin and Barry, 2012; Roux et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, the results of Experiment 2D, in which the effect was found following auditory presentation, suggest that auditory stimulation is sufficient for the encoding of orthographic information in memory (cf. Jakimik, Cole, & Rudnicky, 1985; Whatmough, Arguin, & Bub, 1999). What is particularly striking about this finding in Experiment 2D is that auditory stimulation led to the recognition of orthographic information when the test fragments were unidentified, and therefore there was no possibility for covert articulation of the visually presented test stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neural mechanisms of rapid phonology encoding in alphabetic languages have been investigated using behavioral [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] and neuroimaging [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] methods. In a study investigating the automatic orthographic and phonological activation in the brief identification paradigm, Booth et al, found orthographic and phonological priming effects that favored the automatic activation of phonological information in visual words even in beginning readers [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%