2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00292.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross‐modal generality of the gating deficit

Abstract: Auditory P50/M50 paired-click studies have established an association between schizophrenia and impaired sensory gating in the auditory modality. However, the presumed cross-modal generality of the gating deficit has received little study. The present study examined gating in area 3b of primary somatosensory cortex to evaluate patients' somatosensory gating at this first stage of cortical processing. One hundred twenty-two channels of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data were collected from 27 subjects with chron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(87 reference statements)
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypo-activation in S1 and M1 at later latencies in schizophrenic patients may be explained by the reduced interaction between primary sensorimotor areas and higher-order somatosensory and motor processing areas such as S2 and dPMA, in which hypoactivation was persistent in both hemispheres across all latencies. Finally, it is worth noting that present findings are consistent with other somatosensory studies observing intact early M20 somatosensory activity (Edgar et al 2005) but impaired secondary somatosensory cortex activity at ~80 ms (Thoma et al 2007) in patients with schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Hypo-activation in S1 and M1 at later latencies in schizophrenic patients may be explained by the reduced interaction between primary sensorimotor areas and higher-order somatosensory and motor processing areas such as S2 and dPMA, in which hypoactivation was persistent in both hemispheres across all latencies. Finally, it is worth noting that present findings are consistent with other somatosensory studies observing intact early M20 somatosensory activity (Edgar et al 2005) but impaired secondary somatosensory cortex activity at ~80 ms (Thoma et al 2007) in patients with schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…MEG studies have replicated the well-known pattern of fronto-temporal low-frequency activity observed in EEC, and have also demonstrated abnormal sensory gating and basic cognitive processing (Canive et al, 1996;Kissler et al, 2000;Fehr et al, 2003;Wienbruch et al, 2003;Edgar et al, 2005;Lopez-Ibor et al, 2008;Naatanen and Kahkonen, 2009). A further step in this research is non-linear dynamics analysis (NDA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Second, we used strictly monaural stimulation for each ear separately so as not to induce cross-hearing. Most P50m suppression studies involve binaural stimulations or stimulations at a high sound pressure level to induce cross-hearing (Thoma et al, 2003(Thoma et al, , 2004Edgar et al, 2003Edgar et al, , 2005Lu et al, 2007;Weiland et al, 2008;Hirano et al, 2008Hirano et al, , 2010. Third, since it is well known that P50 is affected by vigilance (Cullum et al, 1993), we used silent movies to keep the subjects awake.…”
Section: Pws Cannot "Gate Out"mentioning
confidence: 98%