2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-modal enhancement of the MMN to speech-sounds indicates early and automatic integration of letters and speech-sounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

20
166
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
20
166
9
Order By: Relevance
“…University (van Atteveldt et al, 2004(van Atteveldt et al, , 2007Blau et al, 2008;Froyen et al, 2008), as stated above, and they also agree with the anatomical examinations of the corresponding areas in macaque monkeys (Schroeder & Foxe, 2002;Schroeder et al, 2003).…”
Section: Applicationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…University (van Atteveldt et al, 2004(van Atteveldt et al, , 2007Blau et al, 2008;Froyen et al, 2008), as stated above, and they also agree with the anatomical examinations of the corresponding areas in macaque monkeys (Schroeder & Foxe, 2002;Schroeder et al, 2003).…”
Section: Applicationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This cross-modal temporal deficit-reflected here as wider windows during which asynchronous events are perceived as synchronous -could result in impaired reading. Given that adequate associations between graphemes and phonemes occur in narrow time windows (Froyen et al, 2008), a cross-modal deficit that results in the widening of audiovisual temporal windows could impair the development of such associations and, as a consequence, reading-that is, it could hamper the formation of adequate representations, creating ambiguity in the correspondences between graphemes and phonemes (Wallace & Stevenson, 2014). This could result in reductions in the speed with which printed representations are decoded (Hairston et al, 2005) and lead to more errors in the accurate pairing of orthography and speech sounds (Hahn, Foxe, & Molholm, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, readers with dyslexia may experience difficulties in the uptake of information and extend their temporal windows to compensate for the difficulties in sensory processing (see, for example, Diederich, Colonius, & Schomburg, 2008;Laurienti, Burdette, Maldjian, & Wallace, 2006, for a similar suggestion regarding older adults). Either way, the idea that abnormally wide temporal windows could result in deficits in processes that require narrow windows (i.e., reading; see Froyen, van Atteveldt, Bonte, & Blomert, 2008) warrants further investigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously argued, a general audiovisual deficit reflected in wider temporal windows of audiovisual processing (i.e., more in-synchrony responses, as shown in the present study) could result in impaired reading. Given that adequate associations between graphemes and phonemes occur in narrow time windows (Froyen et al, 2008), an audiovisual deficit that results in the widening of audiovisual temporal windows could impair the development of such associations and, consequently, reading. That is, it could hamper the formation of adequate representations, creating ambiguity in the correspondences between graphemes and phonemes (Wallace & Stevenson, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We and others (Hairston et al, 2005;Wallace & Stevenson, 2014) have argued that such an expanded time window could result in difficulties in processes that are dependent on the rapid and accurate integration of cues from multiple senses, such as reading (see Froyen, Van Atteveldt, Bonte, & Blomert, 2008). Expanding the temporal window over which auditory and visual events are seen as synchronous could result in inappropriate grapheme-phoneme correspondences and, consequently, in less efficient decoding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%