2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2004.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-market linkages between U.S. and Japanese precious metals futures trading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its importance, with the gold market representing approximately the same gross size as the US--Australian and US -Canadian dollar foreign exchange markets (based on 2010 data in Bank for International Settlements (2011)) we find surprisingly little research has been undertaken on this area in the gold market. Xu and Fung (2005) and Lin, Chiang, and Chen (2008) use GARCH models to examine the COMEX--TOCOM linkages, while Fuangkasem, Chunhachinda, and Nathaphan (2012) look at the COMEX--MIX (india)--TOCOM markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its importance, with the gold market representing approximately the same gross size as the US--Australian and US -Canadian dollar foreign exchange markets (based on 2010 data in Bank for International Settlements (2011)) we find surprisingly little research has been undertaken on this area in the gold market. Xu and Fung (2005) and Lin, Chiang, and Chen (2008) use GARCH models to examine the COMEX--TOCOM linkages, while Fuangkasem, Chunhachinda, and Nathaphan (2012) look at the COMEX--MIX (india)--TOCOM markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have explored the information transmission mechanism across markets in different geographic locations as well as the price linkages between futures market and the corresponding spot market (e.g., Eun and Shim 1989;Ghosh et al 1999;Xu and Fung 2005). Trading activities in futures markets and their interactions with pricing dynamics have also been examined in the literature (i.e., Seguin 1992, 1993;Fung and Patterson 2001;Kao and Fung 2012;Pliska and Shalen 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The δ 2 -coefficient (indicating the degree of volatility persistence) is significant for both the original and proxy stocks. All of these coefficients were found to be smaller than one (except for the odd two out of 400 estimated AS models), which, according to Xu and Fung (2005), is a requirement for the stability of volatility persistence terms. A high level of volatility persistence implies that fluctuations will remain for an extended period.…”
Section: Aggregate Shock Modelsmentioning
confidence: 90%