2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-linking constraints on F-actin structure 1 1Edited by M. F. Moody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
63
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An intermolecular pathway of communication between the DNase-I binding loop and myosin binding sites is consistent with the fact that activation of myosin ATPase requires actin in its polymer form, with a prediction from F-actin models that this loop interacts with subdomains 1 and 3 of an adjacent F-actin subunit along the same long pitch helical strand (26,66,67), and with biochemical evidence for its intermolecular interaction with the C terminus in subdomain 1 of actin (27,68,69). However, the dramatic enhancement of the turnover rate of F-actin subunits in ECP-cleaved F-actin, contrasting with a small effect of subtilisin cleavage (36), argue for participation of only the N-terminal part of the DNase-I binding loop, encompassing ECP cleavage but not subtilisin cleavage site, in the intersubunit interactions as predicted in the F-actin model of Holmes et al (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An intermolecular pathway of communication between the DNase-I binding loop and myosin binding sites is consistent with the fact that activation of myosin ATPase requires actin in its polymer form, with a prediction from F-actin models that this loop interacts with subdomains 1 and 3 of an adjacent F-actin subunit along the same long pitch helical strand (26,66,67), and with biochemical evidence for its intermolecular interaction with the C terminus in subdomain 1 of actin (27,68,69). However, the dramatic enhancement of the turnover rate of F-actin subunits in ECP-cleaved F-actin, contrasting with a small effect of subtilisin cleavage (36), argue for participation of only the N-terminal part of the DNase-I binding loop, encompassing ECP cleavage but not subtilisin cleavage site, in the intersubunit interactions as predicted in the F-actin model of Holmes et al (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is plausible that changes in the arrangement of these structural elements are mutually related. The N-terminal segment of the DNase-I binding loop and Phe 262 to Ile 274 loop, along with the C terminus of actin, form a common interface between three adjacent F-actin subunits (26,27,72). Conformational coupling between the N-terminal segment of the DNase-I binding loop and the Phe 223 to Ala 230 helix has been demonstrated by our limited digestion experiments showing an exposure of proteolytic cleavage sites within segment 227-235 in ECP-modified F-actin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous cross-linking experiments provide supporting evidence for residues expected to be proximal based on models of F-actin. Cross-linking data are available both for protomers related in the lateral direction [i.e., sideways between the two helical strands (18)(19)(20)] and for protomers related in the longitudinal direction [i.e., along one vertical strand of the two stranded F-actin helix (19,21)]. Data from synchrotron x-ray radiolysis experiments, probing the reactivity of solvent-accessible residues, are also consistent with structural models (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Longitudinal dimers are of particular interest for structure determination because many actin-binding proteins attach to two longitudinally adjacent protomers in F-actin. Some information is already available regarding the approximate regions of contact between molecules at this interface (18)(19)(20)(21). A more detailed view of the interface would effectively define the strand structure in F-actin and also could constrain models of the complete double-stranded filament.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymerization time was either 2 min or 2 h at room temperature. Wild-type yeast actin was prepared as described (14), and G-actin was polymerized in 50 mM NaCl͞3 mM MgCl 2 ͞10 mM 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (Mops), pH 7.6͞0.5 mM ATP for 2 h. Tetramethylrhodamine (TMR)-labeled actin was prepared as described (15). A mixture of 10 M G-TMR-actin͞10 M unlabeled G-actin͞10 mM Hepes, pH 7.5͞0.5 mM ATP was converted to Mg 2ϩ form by incubation with EGTA and MgCl 2 and then polymerized by 50 mM KCl͞2 mM MgCl 2 over 3 h. F-Mg 2ϩ -TMR copolymers were diluted to 1.5 M before application to EM grids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%