1992
DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90030-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
338
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(380 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
23
338
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore simply used the raw counts of number words. This provides a distribution of number words much like that observed cross-linguistically by Dehaene and Mehler (1992), but likely overestimates the probability of "one". Noisy data that fits the generative assumptions of the model was created for the learner by pairing each set size with the correct word with probability α, and with a uniformly chosen word with probability 1 − α.…”
Section: The Probabilistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We therefore simply used the raw counts of number words. This provides a distribution of number words much like that observed cross-linguistically by Dehaene and Mehler (1992), but likely overestimates the probability of "one". Noisy data that fits the generative assumptions of the model was created for the learner by pairing each set size with the correct word with probability α, and with a uniformly chosen word with probability 1 − α.…”
Section: The Probabilistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…9 We refer to the survey article of Dehaene and the other articles in the special issue of Cognition 44 (1992). Dehaene and Mehler (1992: 2) state that a "a minimal set of principles of elementary arithmetic might be universal, possibly regardless of culture, language or level of education". The authors refer to the preverbal system of counting and arithmetical reasoning that humans share with a broad range of animals, and to the distance effect in numerical comparison.…”
Section: The Cognitive Status Of Sets Of Favourite Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two systems differentiate in several dimensions: frequency of use, visual complexity, and processing characteristics. Although both Arabic digits and verbal numbers are among the most frequent words of any language (Dehaene, 1997), the frequency of Arabic digits is even higher than that of verbal numbers (Dehaene & Mehler, 1992). The Arabic numeral system has a simple surface format, which can be characterized as a logographic notational system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%