2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21043-3_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Lingual Word Sense Disambiguation for Languages with Scarce Resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 7 also implies that querying FNLP is less time consuming than FarsNet, because it returns fewer and more relevant results. POSe and cross-lingual algorithm (Sarrafzadeh, Yakovets, Cercone, & An, 2011) are also benefited from lexical resources. POSe is almost faster than both HMM and ME plus FNLP but it is employing a smaller dataset and it is less precise.…”
Section: The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7 also implies that querying FNLP is less time consuming than FarsNet, because it returns fewer and more relevant results. POSe and cross-lingual algorithm (Sarrafzadeh, Yakovets, Cercone, & An, 2011) are also benefited from lexical resources. POSe is almost faster than both HMM and ME plus FNLP but it is employing a smaller dataset and it is less precise.…”
Section: The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this research targets analysis of Persian user-generated textual content and the challenges that come with it, regrettably, there is an inadequate number of researches in exploiting machine learning approaches for the Persian language. On the other hand, analyzing Persian textual content also suffers from a lack of resources [6], [7] such as datasets and text manipulation tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of related work addressing the CL-WSD problem in Persian, Sarrafzadeh et al [15] follows a knowledge-based approach by exploiting FarsNet [17]. However, since their evaluation collection is not available, the results are impossible to compare with other possible approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%