2018 7th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icrito.2018.8748435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross Layer Optimization for Wireless Video Transmission Using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [42], the physical and media access control (MAC) layers work in conjunction with the application layer, matching the performance of the lower-layers data rate to that of the application layer bitrate using machine learning. For example, if the system is capable of using 64 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), but the demand dictates that 16-QAM is sufficient, then the system should opt for a less dense constellation with a lower probability of error.…”
Section: Video Streaming Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [42], the physical and media access control (MAC) layers work in conjunction with the application layer, matching the performance of the lower-layers data rate to that of the application layer bitrate using machine learning. For example, if the system is capable of using 64 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), but the demand dictates that 16-QAM is sufficient, then the system should opt for a less dense constellation with a lower probability of error.…”
Section: Video Streaming Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [47], a collaboration between physical, Media Access Control (MAC), and application layers is observed. This alliance aligns the performance of the lower layer data rate with the application layer bitrate via machine learning.…”
Section: Modern Video Streaming Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%