Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing 2007
DOI: 10.1145/1288107.1288123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-layer latency minimization in wireless networks with SINR constraints

Abstract: Recently, there has been substantial interest in the design of crosslayer protocols for wireless networks. These protocols optimize certain performance metric(s) of interest (e.g. latency, energy, rate) by jointly optimizing the performance of multiple layers of the protocol stack. Algorithm designers often use geometric-graphtheoretic models for radio interference to design such cross-layer protocols. In this paper we study the problem of designing crosslayer protocols for multi-hop wireless networks using a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [15], a power-assignment algorithm which schedules a strongly connected set of links in poly-logarithmic time is presented. In [3], the combined problem of routing and power control is addressed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15], a power-assignment algorithm which schedules a strongly connected set of links in poly-logarithmic time is presented. In [3], the combined problem of routing and power control is addressed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], a power-assignment algorithm which schedules a strongly connected set of links in poly-logarithmic time is presented. In [4], the combined problem of routing and power control is addressed.…”
Section: B Link Scheduling Under the Physical Interference Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a joint link scheduling, topology control and routing solution with a much shorter provable scheduling length can be very challenging (Chafekar et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%