2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2010.5501754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Layer Design for TCP Throughput Optimization in Cooperative Relaying Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the cooperation between layer 2 and layer 3, we can get new IP addresses fast, and by the analysis of data from the link layer, we can more accurately obtain physical network conditions. For dealing with channel fading, Bit Error Rates (BER's), and transmission delays in wireless networks, a cross-layer approach is also proposed in [24]. We can get Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) values from the physical layer and available queue sizes from the link layer, and then select better relay nodes for improving total throughputs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By the cooperation between layer 2 and layer 3, we can get new IP addresses fast, and by the analysis of data from the link layer, we can more accurately obtain physical network conditions. For dealing with channel fading, Bit Error Rates (BER's), and transmission delays in wireless networks, a cross-layer approach is also proposed in [24]. We can get Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) values from the physical layer and available queue sizes from the link layer, and then select better relay nodes for improving total throughputs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage is we can straightly assess uplink channel conditions by the WAP/IoT compared to indirectly estimate uplink channel conditions through sensing the downlink channel by end devices. The SNR value for a WAP/IOT gateway can be obtained from the physical layer [24] and can often be accessed from the administration interface. For SNR value evaluation, the WAP/IOT measures and stores the s SNR values within a unit time.…”
Section: A Low Snr Probability (Lsp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While [8], proposed the cross-layer between the MAC and network layers lead to early detection of congestion by routing aware. In [9], the cross layer approach was proposed to optimize the TCP throughput with cooperative relaying network. However, in previous study, routing and TCP with CLS were developed without congestion control adjustment at current congestion window when misperception occur and used the conventional congestion control mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in previous study, routing and TCP with CLS were developed without congestion control adjustment at current congestion window when misperception occur and used the conventional congestion control mechanism. For example, [7]- [9] used routing aware by sending the data through the alternative route, when the network has a problem with invalid route, congestion, buffer overflow or relay condition, thus we call this CLS model as routing-TCP with routing aware (RTCP-RA). Unfortunately, wireless network not only suffer from the random network condition, but also from random variations in channel condition, that lead to poor performance [10], especially in multipath fading, such as Rician and Rayleigh environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of previous study concentrates on physical layer and link layer. Even [13] investigates cross-layer design for TCP over relay networks, the optimized design for optimal energy-efficient performance in TCP traffic in relay networks has not been well studied in above works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%