2019
DOI: 10.1177/0142723719892794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-language distance influences receptive vocabulary outcomes of bilingual children

Abstract: Various studies have shown that bilingual children score lower than their monolingual peers on standardized receptive vocabulary tests. This study investigates if this effect is moderated by language distance. Dutch receptive vocabulary was tested with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT). The impact of cross-language distance was examined by comparing bilingual groups with a small (Close; n = 165) and a large between-language distance (Distant; n = 108) with monolingual controls (n = 39). As a group, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(93 reference statements)
4
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, there may be various degrees of interaction between the two languages depending on the specific languages a bilingual child is learning (Paradis & Genesee, 1996;Serratrice, 2013). Bilingual children learning two languages with great typological proximity were found to have better vocabulary compared to bilingual children learning two languages that are distant from each other (Blom et al, 2020;Floccia et al, 2018). In summary, by the time these children enter school, it is reasonable to hypothesize that they will have a variety of skills in each language as a function of their individual linguistic experience.…”
Section: Rationale For the Potential Presence Of Distinct Dual Langua...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, there may be various degrees of interaction between the two languages depending on the specific languages a bilingual child is learning (Paradis & Genesee, 1996;Serratrice, 2013). Bilingual children learning two languages with great typological proximity were found to have better vocabulary compared to bilingual children learning two languages that are distant from each other (Blom et al, 2020;Floccia et al, 2018). In summary, by the time these children enter school, it is reasonable to hypothesize that they will have a variety of skills in each language as a function of their individual linguistic experience.…”
Section: Rationale For the Potential Presence Of Distinct Dual Langua...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is possible: the number of words in the English task which were cognates with Dutch (42%) was considerably higher than in the Spanish task (17%). This is of course in line with broader differences between the two languages and for this reason, the proficiency task may be considered ecologically valid (Blom et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…On occasion, there were follow up studies of assumptions underlying assessment (e.g. Blom et al, 2019;Floccia et al, 2020 on the concept of linguistic distance) but no direct validations of forms for the bilingual case.…”
Section: Did Studies Validate the Parent Report Instruments For Use I...mentioning
confidence: 99%