2018
DOI: 10.1177/0739986318766511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Lagged Models of Mathematics Achievement and Motivational Factors Among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic High School Students

Abstract: This study examines the disparities in, changes in, and longitudinal interrelationships among mathematics achievement and motivational factors for Hispanics and their White, Black, and Asian peers throughout high school. Analyzing the nationally representative High School Longitudinal Study of 2009, regression results indicate that Hispanics trail other racial/ ethnic groups in math cognitive and psychosocial factors, except that they outperform their Black counterparts in math standardized assessments. Cross-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the typical student factors such as gender, cognitive abilities, and metacognitive (Desoete and De Craene 2019;Lindberg et al 2010), research has confirmed the importance of a range of non-cognitive social psychological factors predictors of student academic success (Lindberg et al 2010;Kim and Choi 2021). In mathematics achievement, these factors include motivation (Levpušček et al 2013;Saw and Chang 2018), goal orientations (Dela Rosa and Bernardo 2013), attitudes (Gjicali and Lipnevich 2021), self-beliefs (Damrongpanit 2019;Szumski and Karwowski 2019) and academic emotions Bernardo 2013, 2016). There are more specific student factors that relate to these social psychological factors such as the students' educational and career aspirations; students who have higher career aspirations that also require higher educational qualifications showing stronger motivations related to achieving in mathematics (Watt et al 2019;Webster and Fisher 2000).…”
Section: Predictors Of Mathematics Learning and Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the typical student factors such as gender, cognitive abilities, and metacognitive (Desoete and De Craene 2019;Lindberg et al 2010), research has confirmed the importance of a range of non-cognitive social psychological factors predictors of student academic success (Lindberg et al 2010;Kim and Choi 2021). In mathematics achievement, these factors include motivation (Levpušček et al 2013;Saw and Chang 2018), goal orientations (Dela Rosa and Bernardo 2013), attitudes (Gjicali and Lipnevich 2021), self-beliefs (Damrongpanit 2019;Szumski and Karwowski 2019) and academic emotions Bernardo 2013, 2016). There are more specific student factors that relate to these social psychological factors such as the students' educational and career aspirations; students who have higher career aspirations that also require higher educational qualifications showing stronger motivations related to achieving in mathematics (Watt et al 2019;Webster and Fisher 2000).…”
Section: Predictors Of Mathematics Learning and Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All eight of the articles described educational settings in the United States. Four of the articles used qualitative methods (Collins & Jones Roberson, 2020; McGee, 2016; Renbarger & Long, 2019; Rinn & Plucker, 2019), two used quantitative methods (Saw & Chang, 2018; Workman, 2020), and two used mixed methods (O’Brennan et al, 2019; Steenbergen-Hu, Olszewski-Kubilius, & Calvert, 2020). A theme that was identified among the psychosocial intervention articles was that psychosocial skills (e.g., self-beliefs, motivation) can support student academic achievement, access to postsecondary talent development, and persistence within advanced learning opportunities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies used only single-item survey measures to assess the impact of STEM summer programs on student outcomes, which have low level of measurement reliability and validity. Moreover, student samples in prior studies were not sociodemographically diverse, and therefore, had limited generalizability and offered no estimates for different sociodemographic subgroups, which could be informative evidence for understanding the changes in STEM motivations among underrepresented groups [23,24]. Improving on prior work, this study aimed to assess the associations between OST STEM program participation and students attitudes toward and career interests in STEM by analyzing multiple years of data from a STEM summer program based in San Antonio, Texas, USA, with a sizable and diverse student sample and a rich set of measures on students' attitudes toward and career interests in math and science.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%