2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-infection effect of polymers of historic and heritage significance on the degradation of a cellulose reference test material

Abstract: The cross-infection effect of 105 polymer samples was studied, using cellulose as a reference test material. In total 14 polymer types were studied, comprising “modern materials” commonly found in historic and artistic collections including: cellulose acetate (CA), cellulose nitrate (CN), poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), polyurethane (PUR) and a selection of specialised packaging materials used in art and heritage conservation. Polymer samples were placed in glass vials containing a piece of the cellulose reference… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiment replication, comparison with control conditions, and a focus only on high peaks in the GC-MS analysis evident in all three repetitions of each test made it possible to obtain meaningful results even in high RH conditions. "Cross infection" or cross-effects of different pollutants in a given environment was not tested here but remains a concern (Tétreault 2003, andCurran et al 2014), i.e., cross infection may involve VOCs emitted from multiple materials in one environment. Our experiments tested only one material in each vessel and therefore did not deal directly with this subject, but there still remains the question of competition between different VOCs from a single material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experiment replication, comparison with control conditions, and a focus only on high peaks in the GC-MS analysis evident in all three repetitions of each test made it possible to obtain meaningful results even in high RH conditions. "Cross infection" or cross-effects of different pollutants in a given environment was not tested here but remains a concern (Tétreault 2003, andCurran et al 2014), i.e., cross infection may involve VOCs emitted from multiple materials in one environment. Our experiments tested only one material in each vessel and therefore did not deal directly with this subject, but there still remains the question of competition between different VOCs from a single material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Strlič et al (2010) admit that visible changes from these substances are likely to occur long after actual chemical deterioration starts, and organic materials may respond to a different range of pollutants than the three metal coupons in the classical Oddy test. Curran et al (2014) noted that degradation reactions often begin prior to any visually evident damage on an organic substance. Daniels and Ward (1982), Odegaard et al (2000), and Thickett and Lee (2004) proposed the use of a series of microchemical spot tests as an alternative to the Oddy test to identify pollutants in cases where time restrictions apply.…”
Section: Evaluating Potential Risk To Organic Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it is a well-known type of paper, which allows the data to be used and compared with previous research. It has been used previously to approximate the effect of the environment on organic materials [12]. Since the sample pH is close to neutral, it is likely susceptible to both acid-catalysed cellulose degradation and oxidation,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPME was developed in the 1990s by Pawliszyn et al [36,37] and is used for extracting volatiles in the headspace over liquid and solid samples. It has been used successfully to extract and analyse VOCs from historic materials [38], including paper [39,40]. GC-MS techniques are routinely used to analyse perfumes and cosmetic preparations [41].…”
Section: Characterisation Of Smellsmentioning
confidence: 99%