2020
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1801320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-generational comparability of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+, wGT3X-BT, and GT9X accelerometers during free-living in adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by freeliving research in children that indicated strong correlations between waist-worn wGT3X-BT and GT9X monitors for mean VM counts and MAD (r=0.996 for both), but a lower (albeit still classified as moderately high) correlation for mean ENMO (r=0.618) and lack of equivalence for mean ENMO between monitors (Clevenger et al, 2020b). The equivalence of the accelerationbased metric MAD in the present study is supported by prior research in free-living adults wearing a wGT3X-BT and GT9X at the hip (Clevenger et al, 2020a). While interest in acceleration-based metrics from ActiGraph monitors is growing, comparability of specific metrics should be considered before widespread implementation as current evidence supports inter-monitor comparability of only the MAD metric.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is supported by freeliving research in children that indicated strong correlations between waist-worn wGT3X-BT and GT9X monitors for mean VM counts and MAD (r=0.996 for both), but a lower (albeit still classified as moderately high) correlation for mean ENMO (r=0.618) and lack of equivalence for mean ENMO between monitors (Clevenger et al, 2020b). The equivalence of the accelerationbased metric MAD in the present study is supported by prior research in free-living adults wearing a wGT3X-BT and GT9X at the hip (Clevenger et al, 2020a). While interest in acceleration-based metrics from ActiGraph monitors is growing, comparability of specific metrics should be considered before widespread implementation as current evidence supports inter-monitor comparability of only the MAD metric.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…indicating that greater caution should be taken when comparing estimates at epoch-level resolution. This difference was largest for the acceleration-based metric ENMO (92.8%) which is in line with prior research comparing two models of ActiGraph devices worn side-by-side in children (mean absolute percent difference in ENMO of 110.9%) (Clevenger et al, 2020b) and adults (80.9%) (Clevenger et al, 2020a). Conversely, the MAD metric had a lower percent difference (68.0%); it may be less impacted by epoch-level fluctuations because it is an indication of variability, not necessarily magnitude, of acceleration over the 5-s epoch.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to limited funding, two accelerometer models were used (ActiGraph GT3X and wGT3X-BT), which measured acceleration at a sampling rate of 30 Hz to generate activity counts/60s. Published research suggests comparability between accelerometer models [75]. Non-wear time was defined as 60 min of continuous zeros and at least four days, of at least 480 min of valid wear data, were required for inclusion in subsequent analysis [76,77].…”
Section: Physical Activity Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%