Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-020-03138-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross genera transferability of microsatellite markers from other members of family Bignoniaceae to Tecomella undulata (Sm.) Seem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the transferability observed (9.05%) was similar to the average of approximately 10% reported in cross-genera transferability studies of eudicots between 1997 and mid-2006 ( Barbará et al, 2007 ). However, the percentage transferability determined here was lower than the cross-genera amplification percentage observed in some families, such as Bignoniaceae (40.58%) ( Kalia et al, 2020 ) and Cactaceae (35.16%) ( Bombonato et al, 2019 ), and much lower than that between species within the same genus ( Miranda et al, 2020 ; Pern et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021 ). The transferability of SSR markers between species or genera is determined by the conservation of DNA sequences and the stability of primer binding sites in flanking regions of SSRs during evolution ( Ellegren, 2000 ; Saeed et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the transferability observed (9.05%) was similar to the average of approximately 10% reported in cross-genera transferability studies of eudicots between 1997 and mid-2006 ( Barbará et al, 2007 ). However, the percentage transferability determined here was lower than the cross-genera amplification percentage observed in some families, such as Bignoniaceae (40.58%) ( Kalia et al, 2020 ) and Cactaceae (35.16%) ( Bombonato et al, 2019 ), and much lower than that between species within the same genus ( Miranda et al, 2020 ; Pern et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021 ). The transferability of SSR markers between species or genera is determined by the conservation of DNA sequences and the stability of primer binding sites in flanking regions of SSRs during evolution ( Ellegren, 2000 ; Saeed et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…One reason might be that the selection of frameshift mutations limits the fixation of microsatellites whose motif lengths are not divisible by three (e.g., di-/tetra-/pentanucleotide repeats), whereas fixation of mutant microsatellite whose motif lengths are divisible by three (tri-/hexanucleotide repeats) is not affected by differential selection pressures in coding and non-coding regions ( Metzgar et al, 2000 ; Dutta et al, 2011 ; Shivakumar et al, 2017 ). Moreover, microsatellites based on a complex nucleotide sequence show a lower mutation rate and higher transferability than simple repeats ( Jin et al, 1996 ; Kalia et al, 2020 ). Given that more than 63% of the SSR markers used in the present study were di-nucleotide motif repeats, this may be an additional reason for the low transferability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%