2004
DOI: 10.1300/j076v39n01_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Gender Perceptions of Corrections Officers in Gender-Segregated Prisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women have worked as correctional officers at female institutions for years, but it was not until the 1970s, following a series of federal acts and commission recommendations, 7 that the glass wall came down, and they gained access to custody and security positions in men’s prisons (Dial, Downey, & Goodlin, 2010; Lawrence & Mahan, 1998). Administrators and male staff members at male institutions strongly opposed allowing women into their ranks, arguing that they were physically vulnerable, and that their presence would put them and their male coworkers at risk (Carlson, Thomas, & Anson, 2004; Tewksbury & Collins, 2006). Opposition was also rooted in inmate privacy concerns (e.g., shower, toilet, and dressing areas, pat searches).…”
Section: Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women have worked as correctional officers at female institutions for years, but it was not until the 1970s, following a series of federal acts and commission recommendations, 7 that the glass wall came down, and they gained access to custody and security positions in men’s prisons (Dial, Downey, & Goodlin, 2010; Lawrence & Mahan, 1998). Administrators and male staff members at male institutions strongly opposed allowing women into their ranks, arguing that they were physically vulnerable, and that their presence would put them and their male coworkers at risk (Carlson, Thomas, & Anson, 2004; Tewksbury & Collins, 2006). Opposition was also rooted in inmate privacy concerns (e.g., shower, toilet, and dressing areas, pat searches).…”
Section: Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have found that male staff is more likely than female staff to accept women in corrections positions. In a study of corrections staff in the Midwest, previous concerns about women working in corrections (i.e., lack of physical strength, incompetence) were no longer prevalent (Carlson et al, 2004). The acceptance of women in corrections was actually reported higher by male corrections officers (COs) than by women COs, and women COs were more likely to perceive males as better supervisors.…”
Section: Tokenism and Women In Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Interestingly, one investigation showed that women officers rated themselves less favorably than men rated women in their ability to supervise and counsel inmates (Carlson et al, 2004).…”
Section: Modern Female Corrections Officersmentioning
confidence: 99%