Cross-frequency coupling explains the preference for simple ratios in rhythmic behaviour and the relative stability across non-synchronous patterns

Abstract

Rhythms are important for understanding coordinated behaviours in ecological systems. The repetitive nature of rhythms affords prediction, planning of movements and coordination of processes within and between individuals. A major challenge is to understand complex forms of coordination when they differ from complete synchronization. By expressing phase as ratio of a cycle, we adapted levels of the Farey tree as a metric of complexity mapped to the range between in-phase and anti-phase synchronization. In a bimanual tapping task, this revealed an increase of variability with ratio complexity, a range of hidden and unstable yet measurable modes, and a rank-frequency scaling law across these modes. We use the phase-attractive circle map to propose an interpretation of these findings in terms of hierarchical cross-frequency coupling (CFC). We also consider the tendency for small-integer attractors in the single-hand repeated tapping of three-interval rhythms reported in the literature. The phase-attractive circle map has wider basins of attractions for such ratios. This work motivates the question whether CFC intrinsic to neural dynamics implements low-level priors for timing and coordination and thus becomes involved in phenomena as diverse as attractor states in bimanual coordination and the cross-cultural tendency for musical rhythms to have simple interval ratios. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Synchrony and rhythm interaction: from the brain to behavioural ecology’.

Species relationships in the extremes and their influence on community stability

“…In many fields, techniques for quantifying the synchrony of signals have historically been crude, but have recently become more detailed, thereby enhancing progress. For instance, one paper in this special issue develops newly detailed frequency-specific descriptions of a kind of synchrony, and then uses them to make new inferences about musical and rhythmic behaviour in humans [37]. The examples of [38] on the interactive vocalizations of primates are also enhanced by a frequency-specific perspective: fig.…”

Aesthetic and physiological effects of naturalistic multimodal music listening

“…Researchers are increasingly foregoing ultimate control for a more ecologically valid approach that enables participants to have more powerful aesthetic experiences. This study follows others that have moved more into the ‘wild’ to explore such naturalistic experiences (Chabin et al, 2022; Czepiel et al, 2021; Dotov & Trainor, 2021; Merrill et al, 2021; Swarbrick et al, 2019; Tervaniemi et al, 2021). The current findings show that self-reported aesthetic experience significantly increases in audiovisual (compared to audio only) piano performances in the naturalistic setting of a concert hall.…”

“…Focusing more specifically on the role of modality, to date only a few studies compare responses to AV vs. AO conditions in naturalistic settings. Compared to eyes-closed conditions, eyes-open conditions increased movement energy and interpersonal coordination, suggesting that visual information may enhance the social aspect of live pop/soul music (Dotov & Trainor, 2021). Coutinho & Scherer (2017) compared emotional responses in a live AV performance to recorded AV, AO, and VO performances of Schubert Lieder, where the live AV condition had significantly higher wonder and significantly lower boredom ratings.…”

Synchrony and rhythm interaction: from the brain to behavioural ecology

“…If not, what could account for their absence? Dotov & Trainor [17] recognized this curious problem and approached it experimentally as well as via modelling. The classic 'finger tapping test' showed that human subjects were unable to sustain other phase relationships, e.g.…”