Fermentation and Biochemical Engineering Handbook 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4557-2553-3.00009-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Flow Filtration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like flux, protein rejection was not constant during the course of filtration, but rather, decreased gradually, except for pure membranes where the correlation was reversed (Figure a). In theory, for common membrane filtrations, membrane rejection increases gradually during the process without any disruptions, due to the increases in resistances to mass transfer from factors such as filtration cake and pore blocking . This trend can be seen in the results for pure membranes (PV0 and PES0) which are functionally common filtration membranes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like flux, protein rejection was not constant during the course of filtration, but rather, decreased gradually, except for pure membranes where the correlation was reversed (Figure a). In theory, for common membrane filtrations, membrane rejection increases gradually during the process without any disruptions, due to the increases in resistances to mass transfer from factors such as filtration cake and pore blocking . This trend can be seen in the results for pure membranes (PV0 and PES0) which are functionally common filtration membranes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A further mechanism that can produce a reduction in rejection with time is the increase in flux of molecules which can occur during concentration polarisation, where the build‐up of molecules near the surface of the membrane forms a boundary layer of higher concentration, which can gradually provide a higher driving force for solution diffusion . This however may be a lesser mechanism in this case because the tangential flow stream usually reduces the effects of concentration polarisation through pushing material away from the membrane surface . It has also been previously reported that concentration polarisation is an unlikely flux‐altering mechanism in wine filtration …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where q ″ represents the heat flux per unit length, whilst T w , T b , T i , and T o represent the wall, bulk, inlet, and outlet temperature, respectively. Accordingly, the hydraulic diameter of the annular channel and the average Nusselt number can then be computed utilizing Equation (11) and Equation (12), respectively [57]. The hydraulic diameter can be defined as the characteristic diameter of noncircular conduits, typically as a ratio of the cross-sectional area and the wetted perimeter, whereas the Nusselt number is dimensionless and is often defined as the ratio of convective heat transfer to conductive heat transfer.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%