2015
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-elicitation responses to 2-methoxymethyl-p-phenylenediamine under hair dye use conditions inp-phenylenediamine-allergic individuals

Abstract: Under simulated hair dye use conditions, a significantly lower degree of cross-elicitation to ME-PPD (30%) was observed than previously reported for PPD (32 of 38, 84%). Additionally, a decreased cross-elicitation strength was observed across all three patch test grades, likely reflecting the reduced skin-sensitization properties of ME-PPD. Consequently, careful dermatological evaluation is required to assess cross-reactivity to ME-PPD in patients allergic to hair dyes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, we found that pretesting with the ME‐PPD‐containing hair colour product of choice was predictive for 77% of PPD/PTD‐allergic individuals (33 of 43), and 67% (29 of 43) tolerated continuous hair colouring during the observation period of approximately 1 year. This indicates that due to its structural difference, the recognition of ME‐PPD by the immune system of a considerable number of allergic individuals is reduced, or possibly completely lacking in some cases . This is in line with the primary prevention benefit of ME‐PPD in terms of significantly reduced skin sensitization potency for all hair colour consumers …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In summary, we found that pretesting with the ME‐PPD‐containing hair colour product of choice was predictive for 77% of PPD/PTD‐allergic individuals (33 of 43), and 67% (29 of 43) tolerated continuous hair colouring during the observation period of approximately 1 year. This indicates that due to its structural difference, the recognition of ME‐PPD by the immune system of a considerable number of allergic individuals is reduced, or possibly completely lacking in some cases . This is in line with the primary prevention benefit of ME‐PPD in terms of significantly reduced skin sensitization potency for all hair colour consumers …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…). The limited cross‐elicitation rate to the full hair colour treatments of 33% (14 of 43) is comparable with the cross‐elicitation rate of 30% to a 30‐min forearm exposure simulating hair dyeing with the maximum ME‐PPD concentration of 2% …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations