Cross effects of government subsidies and corporate social responsibility on carbon emissions reductions in an omnichannel supply chain system

He, Xiao-Song; Jiang, Jiaxiu; Hu, Wenfa

doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108872

Cited by 22 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The findings suggested that, under specific circumstances, a cooperative R&D approach and sharing strategy could be considered the most effective strategies for the supply chain system. In contrast, He et al [29] conducted a study on the influence of government subsidies and corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices on emissions reduction efforts and the profitability of the supply chain system. Their research substantiated that both government subsidies and CSR behaviors contribute to mitigating carbon emissions and enhancing the financial performance of supply chain systems.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic strategy for low-carbon supply chain considering retailers competition and technological innovation

Guo,

Liang,

Lei

2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic strategy for low-carbon supply chain considering retailers competition and technological innovation

Guo,

Liang,

Lei

2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This effectively reduces carbon emissions from the IES. To incentivize the EHIES to provide more low-carbon electricity, the IES will offer a carbon emission subsidy to the EHIES system [26]. The objective function for the EHIES is to minimize operating costs while maximizing earned carbon emission subsidies, as follows:…”

Section: B Coodinated Operation Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coordinated Planning of Electricity-Hydrogen Integrated Energy System Considering Lifecycle Carbon Emissions

Bian,

Zhou,

Guo

et al. 2024

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hydrogen energy is a promising solution to reaching carbon emissions peak and carbon neutrality. With the development of hydrogen energy devices, coupling hydrogen energy with renewable energy for power generation can compensate for the intermittency and instability of renewable energy. Furthermore, the two-stage coordinated planning of integrated energy system (IES) and electricity-hydrogen integrated energy system (EHIES), compared to independent planning, can help generate additional benefits and reduce carbon emissions. Therefore, this paper proposes a coordinated planning of EHIES considering lifecycle carbon emissions. In the first stage, aiming to minimize investment costs, network losses, voltage deviations, and lifecycle carbon emissions, the equipment capacity and location of EHIES is determined. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method is used to quantify the lifecycle carbon emissions of the EHIES, preparing for the coordinated operation in the second stage. Subsequently, in the second stage, using carbon emissions flow to allocate users' responsibility for emissions, the carbon emissions per unit electricity of the IES system are calculated. With the optimal cost of independent operation for IES and EHIES as the coordinated operation objective, the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is employed for sequential solution, obtaining the carbon emissions reduction amount, and iteratively updating until convergence. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by using the IEEE 33-bus power distribution network (PDN) and natural gas 6 node systems. The results show that compared to independent planning, the two-stage coordinated planning method reduces the overall operating cost of IES by 3.81% and decreases carbon emissions by 15.89%. This method is effective in reducing the carbon emissions of IES. INDEX TERMSADMM, Two-stage coordinated planning model, Electricity-Hydrogen Integrated Energy System, Lifecycle carbon emissions NOMENCLATURE ACRONYMS ADMM Alternating direction method of multipliers DES Distributed energy system EHIES Electricity-hydrogen integrated energy system ESS Electric storage systems EV Electric vehicles FC Fuel cells FCS Fast-charging station

show abstract

“…And their conclusion indicates that the retailers with CSR investment gain more profits than those without CSR investment. He et al. (2023) design the framework of an omnichannel supply chain system.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…And their conclusion indicates that the retailers with CSR investment gain more profits than those without CSR investment. He et al (2023) design the framework of an omnichannel supply chain system. Their conclusion proves that CSR can reduce emissions and improve the overall supply chain profits.…”

Section: Csr and Subsidy In Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Jointing quality effort and contract decision in green agri-food supply chain based on differential game

Yang,

et al. 2023

MSCRA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe managerial questions of this paper are as follows, and the authors are trying to solve them: How revenue sharing contract (CSR) degree and government subsidy affect the agri-food quality? What kind of model (WPC, revenue-sharing contract [RSC] and cooperative) would be more effective in motivating manufacturers and retailer to increase effort and improve agri-food quality? What kind of model (WPC, RSC and cooperative) would make manufacturer and retailer better off?Design/methodology/approachConsidering the jointing quality effort and contract decision in green agri-food supply chain, this paper proposes six models that consider CSR of manufacturer and retailer, and then the obtained optimal solutions are compared and analyzed. At the same time, the impact of government subsidies is analyzed, and corresponding conclusions are drawn.FindingsThe results show that, first of all, whether the increasing CSR of the manufacturer or the retailer can motivate both parties to improve the agri-food quality effort investment. Second, the WPC and RSC contract may play different role in different cases. Finally, under the model with government subsidies, regarding positive influence of government subsidies on efforts of manufacturer and retailer, quality and profits of members is investigated. Based on these conclusions, this study puts forward the following policy suggestions. Firstly, governments should formulate reasonable subsidy policies to support manufacturer and retailer to improve the agri-food quality, thereby promoting green industries' development. Secondly, manufacturer and retailer should actively improve CSR and strengthen the effort of agri-food so as to advance quality. Finally, manufacturer and retailer can choose cooperative model or WPC contract.Research limitations/implicationsIn this paper, one manufacturer and one retailer are considered. Since the agri-food supply chain structure in reality is more complicated, the future research direction can consider the supply chain structure with one manufacturer and multiple retailers. In addition, this paper only considers the subsidy, and future research can classify the subsidy into different types.Originality/valueThe study makes two substantive contributions to the body of knowledge in the field of sustainable operations:(1) incorporating quality-based demand function in supply chain and dynamic process of agri-food quality; (2) exploring the impact of CSR awareness of members and subsidy of government on agri-food quality, and comparing the influence in different models.

show abstract

Cross effects of government subsidies and corporate social responsibility on carbon emissions reductions in an omnichannel supply chain system

Cited by 22 publications

References 47 publications

Dynamic strategy for low-carbon supply chain considering retailers competition and technological innovation

Dynamic strategy for low-carbon supply chain considering retailers competition and technological innovation

Coordinated Planning of Electricity-Hydrogen Integrated Energy System Considering Lifecycle Carbon Emissions

Jointing quality effort and contract decision in green agri-food supply chain based on differential game

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About