2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Education for Improving Strength and Mobility After Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
75
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been suggested that strength training of the non-fractured limb in individuals who suffered a distal radius fracture increases both strength and range of motion of the fractured limb at 12 weeks post fracture (Magnus et al, 2013). Despite all these findings, this phenomenon may be unidirectional.…”
Section: 52: Cross Educationmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…It has also been suggested that strength training of the non-fractured limb in individuals who suffered a distal radius fracture increases both strength and range of motion of the fractured limb at 12 weeks post fracture (Magnus et al, 2013). Despite all these findings, this phenomenon may be unidirectional.…”
Section: 52: Cross Educationmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Mirror training is used in the treatment of chronic pain conditions (Bowering et al 2013) and to improve motor function after stroke (Thieme et al 2012). Somewhat surprisingly, recent work without a mirror showed that strength training of the unaffected limb is beneficial for the recovery of the impaired limb after stroke (Clark and Patten 2013;Dragert andZehr 2011, 2013), wrist fractures (Magnus et al 2013), and anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery (Papandreou et al 2013). The performance improvement in the contralateral homologous muscle of the nontrained limb following a period of effortful unilateral motor practice is referred to as cross-education (Farthing et al 2007;Hortobagyi 2005;Munn et al 2004;Zhou 2000), but there may be additional clinical benefits from the hypothesis that unilateral strength training with a mirror could augment the crosseducation of muscle strength (Howatson et al 2013;Zult et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical efficacy of cross-education has been examined in studies of immobilization Magnus et al 2010;Pearce et al 2012), wrist fracture (Magnus et al 2013) and more recently in stroke (Dragert and Zehr 2013). However, to optimise the clinical benefits of cross-education, exploring the spatial effects is important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%