2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06028-6_72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Domain Collaborative Filtering with Factorization Machines

Abstract: Abstract. Factorization machines offer an advantage over other existing collaborative filtering approaches to recommendation. They make it possible to work with any auxiliary information that can be encoded as a real-valued feature vector as a supplement to the information in the user-item matrix. We build on the assumption that different patterns characterize the way that users interact with (i.e., rate or download) items of a certain type (e.g., movies or books). We view interactions with a specific type of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…little information about the consumption of Classical music through social media), alternative approaches for the acquisition of Classical music preferences through social media should be sought. The concept of cross-domain recommendations (as shown, for instance, by Loni et al [6]) could be used; Classical and non-Classical genres can be treated as different domains and hence take advantage of the methods developed for cross-domain recommendations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…little information about the consumption of Classical music through social media), alternative approaches for the acquisition of Classical music preferences through social media should be sought. The concept of cross-domain recommendations (as shown, for instance, by Loni et al [6]) could be used; Classical and non-Classical genres can be treated as different domains and hence take advantage of the methods developed for cross-domain recommendations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, we investigate the correlation of the listening measure distributions between the two datasets, for the same genre (intra-genre, inter-dataset) and between all genres within each dataset 6 This figure is similar for Blues, Country, Jazz, Vocal, and World; but Electronic, Folk, HipHop, Metal, Pop, and Rock show smaller values for cumulative PC at top 20 artists (between 18% and 30%). 7 These cumulative PC values on the bottom 500 artists are similar for RnB and World; smaller (around 1%) for Blues, Country, EasyListening, and Vocal; and considerably higher for Electronic, Folk, HipHop, Jazz, Metal, Pop, Rap, and Rock (between 5% and 10%).…”
Section: Correlation Between Data Sources?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another set of research efforts focused on cross-domain recommendations which model users in a given domain and employ the model in a target domain. Works described in [8-10, 40, 41] and [42] are some examples from crossdomain recommendation systems. These systems mostly use item-based matches and do not consider users' identities or they use data from a single source and assume different categories, such as books and movies, as different domains.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two FMs are built for each problem and correlated with each other by sharing some common features or latent factors. Loni et al [16] applied FMs to cross-domain collaborative filtering. This method exploits knowledge from auxiliary domains to improve recommendation on a target domain, by concatenating the features from auxiliary domains and target domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%