2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40142-014-0045-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Disorder Comparison of Four Neuropsychiatric CNV Loci

Abstract: Copy number variants (CNVs) have been identified as a major risk factor in neuropsychiatric disorders. In this review, we describe the phenotypes and syndromic features associated with CNVs at four of the bestcharacterized risk loci for these disorders: 15q11.2-13.1, 22q11.2, 16p11.2, and 7q11.23. By considering the reported prevalence of these CNVs in autism, intellectual disability, schizophrenia, and controls, we demonstrate a pattern of asymmetric shared risk in which CNVs increase the risk of multiple dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overlap with schizophrenia loci appears to be more selective; for example, 16p11.2 duplications are associated with schizophrenia, while 16p11.2 deletions are not (Szatkiewicz et al, 2014). These observations are consistent with a model in which CNVs contribute risk to a number of neuropsychiatric disorders (Moreno-De-Luca et al, 2013a; Stefansson et al, 2014); however, the extent of this risk varies between phenotypes for each locus (Moreno-De-Luca et al, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The overlap with schizophrenia loci appears to be more selective; for example, 16p11.2 duplications are associated with schizophrenia, while 16p11.2 deletions are not (Szatkiewicz et al, 2014). These observations are consistent with a model in which CNVs contribute risk to a number of neuropsychiatric disorders (Moreno-De-Luca et al, 2013a; Stefansson et al, 2014); however, the extent of this risk varies between phenotypes for each locus (Moreno-De-Luca et al, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This interpretation is supported by the results of the Low Confidence comparison (see Supplemental Information). Alternatively, other explanatory models regarding differential thresholds for behavioral expression of ASD based on heightened risk from rare de novo mutations and/or compensatory mechanisms may be relevant to those with High Confidence genes diagnosed with ASD (34, 35). Regardless, continued study of these early milestone and autism symptom profiles, both in samples of heterogeneous genetic abnormalities and with specific genetic abnormalities (e.g., Fragile X), is required to move these findings from observational to informing risk assessment for genetic testing in clinics (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though we observe lower IQ among probands that carry de novo frameshift indels, compared to probands without any de novo LoF mutations, the difference is small (6.3 IQ points), accounts for only a fraction of the variance in IQ (R 2 =0.004), and the distribution of IQ is similar to that of other probands (Figure 3B). Moreover, given an emerging picture of shared risks for de novo SNVs among a wide range of neurodevelopmental syndromes (Allen et al, 2013; Fromer et al, 2014; Moreno-De-Luca et al, 2014), the most parsimonious explanation is that a subset of highly disruptive risk mutations are associated with a range of phenotypic outcomes that includes, but is not limited to, ID, ASD, schizophrenia, and epilepsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%