Cross Disciplinary Role Agreement is Needed When Coordinating Long‐Term Opioid Prescribing for Cancer: a Qualitative Study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer pain is highly prevalent and often managed in primary care or by oncology providers in combination with primary care providers. OBJECTIVES: To understand interdisciplinary provider experiences coordinating opioid pain management for patients with chronic cancer-related pain in a large integrated healthcare system. DESIGN: Qualitative research. PARTICIPANTS: We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with interdisciplinary providers in two large academically affiliated VA Medical Centers and their associated community-based outpatient clinics. Participants included primary care providers (PCPs) and oncology-based personnel (OBPs). APPROACH: We deductively identified 94 examples of care coordination for cancer pain in the 20 interviews. We secondarily used an inductive open coding approach and identified themes through constant comparison coming to research team consensus. RESULTS: Theme 1: PCPs and OBPs generally believed one provider should handle all opioid prescribing for a specific patient, but did not always agree on who that prescriber should be in the context of cancer pain. Theme 2: There are special circumstances where having multiple prescribers is appropriate (e.g., a pain crisis). Theme 3: A collaborative process to opioid cancer pain management would include real-time communication and negotiation between PCPs and oncology around who will handle opioid prescribing. Theme 4: Providers identified multiple barriers in coordinating cancer pain management across disciplines. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings highlight how real-time negotiation about roles in opioid pain management is needed between interdisciplinary clinicians. Lack of crossdisciplinary role agreement may result in delays in clinically appropriate cancer pain management.

Exploring expanded interdisciplinary roles in goals of care conversations in a national goals of care initiative: A qualitative approach

“…27,[31][32][33][34]38 We finalized boundaries and definitions of codes through conversation and consensus with input from a team member with organizational theory (KG) expertise. 34,38,39 Further, education related codes were identified to evaluate the impact of education on roles. 25 We piloted the application of the code list through dual review (JM and MH) of one transcript.…”

Facilitators of palliative care quality improvement team cohesion

“…The principle of CDRA (Giannitrapani et al, 2016(Giannitrapani et al, , 2021 reflects the need for coordination and agreement across interdisciplinary clinical team roles. When applied to clinical and QI teaming, CDRA suggests the importance of an effective team to have members whose roles and duties act synergistically to achieve a unified team goal.…”