Cross- cultural validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN): study of the items and internal consistency

Osório, Flávia de Lima; Crippa, José Alexandre de Souza; Loureiro, Sônia Regina

doi:10.1590/s1516-44462008005000018

Cited by 48 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…É composto por 10 itens pontuados em uma escala likert de 0 (discordo totalmente) a 5 (concordo inteiramente), que tem por objetivo avaliar a autopercepção do desempenho na situação específica de falar em público. É dividida em duas subescalas: autoavaliação positiva (itens 1, 3, 5, 6, 9) e autoavaliação negativa (itens 2, 4, 7, 8, 10); b) Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) 16 -versão traduzida e adaptada para o português do Brasil por Osório et al 17 . Instrumento autoaplicado para avaliação do TAS, composto por 17 itens pontuados em uma escala likert de 5 pontos; c) Mini Social Phobia Inventory (MS) 14 -versão traduzida e adaptada para o português do Brasil por Osório et al 18 .…”

Section: Materiaisunclassified

Aspectos cognitivos do falar em público: validação de uma escala de autoavaliação para universitários brasileiros

Osório¹,

Crippa²,

Loureiro³

2012

Rev. psiquiatr. clín.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoContexto: O falar em público é o medo mais prevalente na população geral e no Transtorno de Ansiedade Social (TAS). Assim sendo, estudos que dimensionem essa situação específica são necessários. Objetivos: Validar a Self Statements during Public Speaking (SSPS) em amostra da população geral de estudantes universitários (PG -n = 2.314), casos (C -n = 88) e não casos de TAS (NC -n = 90) do Brasil. Métodos: Conduziu-se o estudo em duas fases: a) preenchimento dos questionários autoaplicados em sala de aula; b) participação em entrevista telefônica e ao vivo. Resultados: Evidenciaram-se correlações baixas/moderadas entre SSPS e Inventário de Fobia Social (PG = 0,22-0,65; C = 0,28-0,32; NC = 0,21-0,30), Inventário de Ansiedade de Beck (PG = 0,18-0,53; C = 0,25-0,33; NC = 0,22-0,25) e Escala Breve de Fobia Social (C = não significativa, NC = 0,23-0,31) nas diferentes amostras, especialmente para a PG. A análise fatorial apontou a presença de dois fatores, associados à autoavaliação positiva e negativa. O estudo da validade discriminativa evidenciou a capacidade da SSPS de discriminar os casos dos não casos de TAS. Conclusão: A SSPS é adequada para uso no contexto brasileiro, sendo que a subescala autoavaliação positiva parece ser mais efetiva para a avaliação de amostras identificadas ou suspeitas de TAS e a subescala autoavaliação negativa ter uma característica mais rastreadora quando aplicada em amostras da população geral.Osório FL, et al. / Rev Psiq Clín. 2012;39(2):48-53 Palavras-chave: Falar em público, ansiedade social, validação, escala. AbstractBackground: Fear of public speaking is the most prevalent fear in the general population and among persons with a social anxiety disorder (SAD). Nevertheless, studies about the assessment of this specific phenomenon are still needed. Objectives: To examine the validity of the Self Statements during Public Speaking (SSPS) scale in a general population of Brazilian university students (GP, n = 2314), in an SAD sample (n = 88), and in a non-SAD sample (n = 90). Methods: The study was conducted in two phases: a) completing a self-administered questionnaire in the classroom, b) participating in a telephone and face-to-face interview. Results: The SSPS showed low/median correlations with the Social Phobia Inventory (GP = 0.22-0.65; SAD = 0.28-0.32; non-SAD = 0.21-0.30), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (GP = 0.18-0.53; SAD = 0.25-0.33; non-SAD = 0.22-0.25), and the Brief Social Phobia Scale (SAD = not significant, non-SAD = 0.23-0.31) in all the samples, especially in the GP sample. Factorial analysis indicated the presence of two factors associated with positive and negative self-assessment. The study of discriminative validity demonstrated that the SSPS has the ability to differentiate between cases and non-cases of SAD. Discussion: The SSPS is an adequate instrument to be used within the Brazilian context. The positive self-assessment subscale seems to be more effective for the evaluation of SAD samples. The negative self-assessment subscale appears to have a better s...

show abstract

Section: Materiaisunclassified

Aspectos cognitivos do falar em público: validação de uma escala de autoavaliação para universitários brasileiros

Osório¹,

Crippa²,

Loureiro³

2012

Rev. psiquiatr. clín.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…10,11 The procedure used for this process follows most of the steps recommended by the TCA group, in addition to being more detailed in linguistic terms.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese of the Measure of Parental Style (MOPS) - a self-reported scale - according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) recommendations

Baeza

Caldieraro

Pinheiro

et al. 2010

Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To describe the translation and adaptation methodology for the Measure of Parental Style, a self-report instrument developed originally in English, following the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines, comparing this to other methodologies used for the same purposes. Method: Translation and Cultural Adaptation group International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines were followed (preparation, first forward translation, reconciliation, back translation, revision of back translation, harmonization, cognitive debriefing, revision of debriefing results, syntax and orthographic revision, final report). Conclusion: A careful and qualified cross-cultural translation and adaptation of an instrument contribute for measuring what it is designed to measure across cultures. Presenting this process, besides its final product, provides the opportunity that this experience could be replicated for adaptation of other instruments. Descriptors

show abstract

“…The inclusion criteria were age o 18 years and frequent participation in musical performances. The participants completed the K-MPAI 2,12 and the self-report Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) 13,14 individually.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the latter analysis, the presence of SAD as determined by a total SPIN score o 19, was taken as the gold-standard parameter as proposed by Osó rio et al 14 The significance level was set at p f 0.05.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parameters for screening music performance anxiety

Barbar

Crippa

Osório

2014

Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To assess the discriminative capacity of the Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory (K-MPAI), in its version adapted for Brazil, in a sample of 230 Brazilian adult musicians. Method: The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) was used to assess the presence of social anxiety indicators, adopting it as the gold standard. The Mann-Whitney U test and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for statistical analysis, with p f 0.05 set as the significance level. Results: Subjects with social anxiety indicators exhibited higher mean total K-MPAI scores, as well as higher individual scores on 62% of its items. The area under the ROC curve was 0.734 (p = 0.001), and considered appropriate. Within the possible cutoff scores presented, the score -15 had the best balance of sensitivity and specificity values. However, the score -7 had greater specificity and accuracy. Conclusion: The K-MPAI showed appropriate discriminant validity, with a marked association between music performance anxiety and social anxiety. The cutoff scores presented in the study have both clinical and research value, allowing screening for music performance anxiety and identification of possible cases.

show abstract

Cross- cultural validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN): study of the items and internal consistency

Cited by 48 publications

References 13 publications

Aspectos cognitivos do falar em público: validação de uma escala de autoavaliação para universitários brasileiros

Aspectos cognitivos do falar em público: validação de uma escala de autoavaliação para universitários brasileiros

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese of the Measure of Parental Style (MOPS) - a self-reported scale - according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) recommendations

Parameters for screening music performance anxiety

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About