Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Questionnaire: Debriefing Experience Scale

Tosterud, Randi; Petzäll, Kerstin; Wangensteen, Sigrid; Hall‐Lord, Marie‐Louise

doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.09.011

Cited by 12 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The simplified Chinese version DES showed good potential in discriminating nursing students’ experiences of debriefing. This is consistent with the original version [ 15 ], the translated Norwegian version [ 18 ], and the Portuguese version [ 19 ]. The reliability of the simplified Chinese DES was confirmed by the medium to high Cronbach's alpha coefficients as well, except for the subscale "Analyzing Thoughts and Feelings".…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…It was much like the result of the Portuguese version [ 19 ]. In the Norwegian version [ 18 ], the Cronbach’ alpha coefficient for the subscale “facilitator skill in conducting the debriefing” was 0.44 and for the total scale was 0.86. After two items were removed, an improved alpha value of 0.91 and 0.66 was noted for the total scale and the subscale, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Discrepancy is commonly seen when testing the factor structure of a scale within a different cultural context [ 22 ]. Previous researchers indicated the scale would benefit from reducing the subscales [ 18 , 19 ]. In this study, EFA with Oblimin rotation found a quite unexpected grouping and item 12 “Unsettled feelings from the simulation were resolved by debriefing” was suggested for deletion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results showed that the internal consistency reliability, measured by Cronbach’s alpha, was reported to be 0.93 for the experience scale and 0.91 for the importance scale [ 15 ]. The scale has been translated into Norwegian [ 18 ] and Portuguese [ 19 ], and these translations have shown good psychometric properties and potential for use. There is no report of a Chinese version of the DES that has been verified for reliability and validity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the Debriefing Experience Scale (DES): a cross-sectional study

Xie

Liu

et al. 2022

BMC Med Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Debriefing Experience Scale (DES) is a tool that is used to explore nursing students’ subjective experiences during a debriefing and to help determine best debriefing practices. A Chinese version of the scale has not been found; its development can enhance learning in simulation activites in Chinese healthcare education programs. Methods A simplified Chinese version of the DES was developed and tested using 34 Chinese undergraduate (second year) nursing students. They participated in six simulation scenarios and debriefings. Eight experts were consulted to determine the content validity of the scale. Critical ratio method, Cronbach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient, correlation coefficient and factor analysis were used in testing the psychometric properties of the scale. Results Analysis of 200 scales showed that the simplified Chinese version of the DES had good potential in discriminatiing Chinese nursing students’ experiences of debriefing. Conclusions The simplified Chinese DES was effective in evaluating the experience of debriefing. A larger sample size and multicenter research is needed to confirm these findings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the Debriefing Experience Scale (DES): a cross-sectional study

Xie

Liu

et al. 2022

BMC Med Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Following the debriefing, the students completed the Norwegian translated version of the Debriefing Experience Scale (Reed, 2012). The scale originally consisted of four subscales, but due to a previous validation process showing that the scale would benefit from a reduction of the subscales (Tosterud et al, 2015), the Norwegian version consists of three subscales. The first, Analyzing Thoughts and Feelings (four items), identifies experiences related to emotional, psychological, behavioral and environmental aspects.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploration of Two Different Structures for Debriefing in Simulation: The Influence of the Structure on the Facilitator Role

Tosterud

Kjølberg

Kongshaug

et al. 2020

Simulation & Gaming

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. In the use of simulation as a learning approach, a structured debriefing is important for students to achieve learning. The facilitator's feedback style and abilities in facilitating are crucial, and have a great impact on the learning environment. The facilitators should facilitate for student active learning, and provide helpful feedback to empower students as self-regulated learners. The aim of the study was to explore the Steinwachs structure and the Critical Response Process structure when used in debriefing in medical simulation, and how each of them affected the facilitator's role. Method.A multi-method, comparative quasi-experimental design was used.Results. Structuring debriefing in accordance with the Critical Response Process facilitated a facilitator role that coincided with factors highlighted in theory on how to facilitate student active learning and the development self-regulating learners. Structuring debriefing in accordance with the Steinwachs structure revealed that debriefing seemed to be based more on the facilitator's frames and dominance than the students' frames and involvement.Conclusion. The results of this study showed that Critical Response Process (CRP) can be an appropriate structure to use in debriefing in medical simulation.

show abstract

Strategic Debriefing in Practice

Capogna¹,

Ingrassia²,

Capogna³

et al. 2022

Strategic Debriefing for Advanced Simulation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Questionnaire: Debriefing Experience Scale

Cited by 12 publications

References 23 publications

Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the Debriefing Experience Scale (DES): a cross-sectional study

Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the Debriefing Experience Scale (DES): a cross-sectional study

Exploration of Two Different Structures for Debriefing in Simulation: The Influence of the Structure on the Facilitator Role

Strategic Debriefing in Practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About