2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315575131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Hagiographical Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Hollander (2020Hollander ( , 2021. These perspectives thoughtfully engage with and extend Rondolino's (Rondolino 2017). 9…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…8 Hollander (2020Hollander ( , 2021. These perspectives thoughtfully engage with and extend Rondolino's (Rondolino 2017). 9…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…While I reject the postmodern critics' characterization of comparison as an impossible act of intellectual hubris, inevitably distorting the local and particular, I am convinced by their general call for an increase in scholarly reflexivity: a posture not coincidentally shared with all theoretically robust contemporary approaches to comparison in Religious Studies. 1 Indeed, well-meaning attempts to avoid terms with problematic etymologies or usage histories, as identified by these critiques, often fall victim to their own unquestioned assumptions, as Rondolino (2017) notes in the introduction to Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Hagiographical Strategies:…”
Section: Thinking (And Teaching) About Dreams From the Standpoint Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations