1997
DOI: 10.1108/01437739710182287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross‐cultural leadership dynamics in collectivism and high power distance settings

Abstract: Individualism‐collectivism and power distance are among the dimensions of national culture frequently discussed in the leadership literature and in executive development programmes. Examines cross‐cultural leadership implications of the likely interaction of collectivism and high power distance. Includes a call for more awareness of how collectivism and power distance may together influence workplace behaviour. Suggests that this awareness needs to be incorporated in cross‐cultural leadership training and rese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Malaysians are generally friendly and will go out of their way to help a person in need, especially when they see the expatriate spouse and family members take the time to learn the local language and are sensitive to the differences in culture (Malaysian Industrial Development Authority Report, 2009). This is reflective of the collectivist culture and on the religious teachings of Islam where a person is responsible for his/her immediate neighbors' safety and happiness (Schermerhorn & Bond, 1997). According to the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) study, Malaysians score high on the humane orientation dimension, whereby the collective group encourages and rewards individuals for being altruistic, generous, caring and kind to others (Javidan & House, 2002;Lim, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Malaysians are generally friendly and will go out of their way to help a person in need, especially when they see the expatriate spouse and family members take the time to learn the local language and are sensitive to the differences in culture (Malaysian Industrial Development Authority Report, 2009). This is reflective of the collectivist culture and on the religious teachings of Islam where a person is responsible for his/her immediate neighbors' safety and happiness (Schermerhorn & Bond, 1997). According to the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) study, Malaysians score high on the humane orientation dimension, whereby the collective group encourages and rewards individuals for being altruistic, generous, caring and kind to others (Javidan & House, 2002;Lim, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it was easier for spouses to gain access to the wealth of information that the HCNs possess and in turn use this information to help the expatriates making them more accessible to the local counterparts. This is especially helpful in making the expatriates more sensitive to cross-cultural nuances and ensuring leader-follower interactions are better understood (Schermerhorn & Bond, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schermerhorn and Bond (1997) also suggest surprise as a potential result of the difference between expected and manifest cultures. Fiedler and Blanco (2006) further note that a scenario involving different perceptions of sexual harassment could conceivably lead to fines, and damage to an organization's reputation.…”
Section: Effects Of International Cross-cultural Mixed Messagesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Another level of international cross-cultural mixed messages regarding the behavior of others can be found in Schermerhorn and Bond's (1997) concepts of expected culture versus manifest culture, which they presented in the context of expatriates. The expected culture is how one believes individuals of another culture will behave, "based on prior cultural training, personal anticipations, and even suggestions from conversations with others" (p. 187).…”
Section: Expectations For Othersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Among these dimensions, Hofestede's dimensions were used as a paradigm in 274 cases within different disciplines (Søndergaard, 1994). Till these days, Hofestede's cultural dimensions are still used by many researchers including Humphreys (1996), Harvey (1997), Schermerhorn and Bond (1997), Furrer et al (2000), Robins and Stylianou (2001), Chang (2003), Kanousi (2005), M. Tawakoli and A. Tawakoli (2010), Park (2011), Baker, Meyer, andChebat (2013) and Mazanec, Crotts, Gursoy, and Lu (2015). Such intensive and continuous use of Hofestede's dimensions shows the reliability, validity and importance of Hofestede work in understanding culture and its impact on human practices.…”
Section: The Impact Of Culture On Tourists' Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%