2015
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural influences on rhythm processing: reproduction, discrimination, and beat tapping

Abstract: The structures of musical rhythm differ between cultures, despite the fact that the ability to entrain movement to musical rhythm occurs in virtually all individuals across cultures. To measure the influence of culture on rhythm processing, we tested East African and North American adults on perception, production, and beat tapping for rhythms derived from East African and Western music. To assess rhythm perception, participants identified whether pairs of rhythms were the same or different. To assess rhythm p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…American 6‐month‐olds show no such difference in processing of isochronous and nonisochronous meters; 12‐month‐olds do show a difference, but it is eliminated by 2 weeks of listening to Balkan music, while this was not the case for U.S. adults . There is also evidence for cross‐cultural differences in rhythm production as a function of enculturation …”
Section: Probabilistic Prediction In Music Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…American 6‐month‐olds show no such difference in processing of isochronous and nonisochronous meters; 12‐month‐olds do show a difference, but it is eliminated by 2 weeks of listening to Balkan music, while this was not the case for U.S. adults . There is also evidence for cross‐cultural differences in rhythm production as a function of enculturation …”
Section: Probabilistic Prediction In Music Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…126 There is also evidence for cross-cultural differences in rhythm production as a function of enculturation. 128,129 Can such enculturation effects be accurately simulated using computational models? As noted above, rule-based models of meter 9,12,[66][67][68] are not sensitive to experience and therefore cannot plausibly account for enculturation, while approaches that simulate meter perception as emerging from the resonance of coupled oscillators that entrain to temporal periodicities 71,73,130,131 naturally imply an explanation of meter in terms of stimulus structure rather than the experience of the listener.…”
Section: Metrical Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Musical rhythm exists in all known human cultures, and the ability to move in time with musical rhythm occurs in humans without specialized training. However, there are wide individual differences in rhythm perception, associated with age (McAuley et al, 2006), culture (Soley & Hannon, 2010;Cameron et al, 2015), auditory short-term memory (Grahn & Schuit, 2012), and musical training (Palmer & Krumhansl, 1990;Kung et al, 2011;Bailey & Penhune, 2010;Chen et al, 2008). Trained musicians have more detailed representations of metrical structure (Palmer & Krumhansl, 1990) and more accurate perception of metrical structure and rhythmic groups than nonmusicians (Kung et al, 2011).…”
Section: Rhythmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para Frick (1985) o significado emocional das canções de ninar é o fator que independe de convenções étnicas. Trehub et al (1993) (Castellano, Bharucha & Krumhansl, 1984), percepção e produção de ritmo em africanos e norte-americanos (Cameron, Bentley & Grahn, 2015), percepção da métrica em canções ocidentais e asiáticas por bebês turcos e norte americanos (Soley & Hannon, 2010), percepção de ritmo em africanos e europeus (Toiviainn & Eerola, 2003) e na avaliação da complexidade de músicas ocidentais e africanas por europeus e africanos (Eerola, Luck & Toiviainen, 2006).…”
Section: Objetivos E Justificativasunclassified