Ninety-six gifted and non-gifted fourth and fifth grade students were taught either Italian vocabulary or information about North American minerals via free study or mnemonic (memory strategy) instruction. They were then asked to transfer their learning strategy to a novel content area. Results indicated that both gifted and non-gifted students can benefit from mnemonic strategy instruction. Only the gifted students, however, were able to successfully transfer the strategy spontaneously to a new content area. Implications for mnemonic instruction of gifted learners are given.Recent research reported by the present authors has suggested that the differential ability to produce effective learning strategies is responsible for much of the observed performance differences between gifted and non-gifted students on school learning tasks (Scruggs, 1982;Scruggs & Cohn, 1983;. For example, in learning the nonmeaningful word pair Volvap-Nares, non-gifted junior high school students tended to use rote rehearsal strategies (e.g., "I said them over and over to myself"), while their gifted counterparts were much more likely to actively transform the information in order to make it meaningful (e.g., "I thought, 'a Volvo is a nice car"'). When gifted students did not report using such strategies, their performance levels resembled non-gifted students, leading to the conclusion that it was the active processing of novel information which distinguished the two groups; rather than, for example, a structural difference in short-term learning.