2007
DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Cultural Application of the “Sniffin’ Sticks” Odor Identification Test

Abstract: After revision of the descriptors, the ''Sniffin' Sticks'' odor identification test appears to be suited for assessment of olfactory identification function in an Asian region.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
50
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
50
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports found that people often confuse nasal patency with olfactory abilities [19], and that self-assessments are accurate only when subjects perceive their sense of smell as bad or very bad [18]. We observed similar values of the 10th percentile of scores obtained by healthy participants comparing to results obtained in Czech Republic [20], Taiwan [11], Poland [21] and Germany [6], except for the oldest group ([55 years). This difference can easily be explained by the relatively small number of participants in that age group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous reports found that people often confuse nasal patency with olfactory abilities [19], and that self-assessments are accurate only when subjects perceive their sense of smell as bad or very bad [18]. We observed similar values of the 10th percentile of scores obtained by healthy participants comparing to results obtained in Czech Republic [20], Taiwan [11], Poland [21] and Germany [6], except for the oldest group ([55 years). This difference can easily be explained by the relatively small number of participants in that age group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, we compared the identification scores of normosmic subjects and people with olfactory disorders, controlling also for sex of the participants. Similar to former studies, we did not observe any differences in the ability to recognize odors between men and women [11,12], and we found significant differences between healthy subjects and people reporting olfactory disorders [18]. Although our analyses revealed a main effect of the degree of impairment on the SST identification test result, there was no significant difference between controls and patients with mild olfactory disorders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, despite their straightforward management, both the ''Sniffin Sticks'' identification subtest and the UPSIT share issues related to a high degree of cognitive processing [19], and of having a strong dependence on cultural contexts [30,46] in comparison with the threshold test. On the other hand, it seems that odor identification tests reflect everyday olfactory experiences to a higher degree than odor thresholds [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%