Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 2017
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Cultural Adaption of the GRBAS and CAPE-V Scales for Portugal and a New Training Programme for Perceptual Voice Evaluation

Abstract: Several methods have been proposed for the perceptual evaluation of voice quality, but the GRBAS and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) scales are the most widely used and recommended as part of standardised voice evaluation protocols. In this study, cross-cultural adaptation and translation of the GRBAS (the first translation from the original Japanese version) and CAPE-V scales to European Portuguese were carried out following international guidelines. Results from a study of the intr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hirano developed it in 1981 to evaluate the severity of dysphonia and the type of voice quality. The Hirano GRBAS scale which is examinerbased is the gold standard in perceptual analysis of voice (Jesus et al, 2017) and considers the severity of a vocal disorder along a scale divided into regular intervals. The GRBAS scale is valid and reliable and provides no discomfort or inconvenience to both the patient and a therapist.…”
Section: Grbas Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hirano developed it in 1981 to evaluate the severity of dysphonia and the type of voice quality. The Hirano GRBAS scale which is examinerbased is the gold standard in perceptual analysis of voice (Jesus et al, 2017) and considers the severity of a vocal disorder along a scale divided into regular intervals. The GRBAS scale is valid and reliable and provides no discomfort or inconvenience to both the patient and a therapist.…”
Section: Grbas Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference acoustic databases allow the standardization of acoustic analysis, benchmarking and comparing the performance of different voice analysis techniques. They also allow to differentiate normal voice and pathological voice, to evaluate and monitor it clinically, and to diminish the subjectivity that underlies the acoustic-perceptual analysis [22] by establishing a correlation between quantitative data. Results can be interpreted reliably, as long as they are collected by the same equipment, and the same data collection methods and recording techniques are used [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%