2020
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.0542.r2.16042020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reproducibility of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire among older Brazilians with acute low back pain. A cross-sectional study

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) has emerging as an epidemic, multifactorial and multidimensional condition in older age. Assessment of attitudes and beliefs of patients with back pain is necessary for understanding the impact of psychosocial factors on pain perception and management. OBJECTIVES: To cross-culturally adapt and examine the validity and reproducibility (intra and interrater reliability and agreement) of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) in older Brazilia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Test-retest reliability of the Hausa-BBQ demonstrated a highly significant correlation (ICC = 0.91), suggesting acceptable reliability. Remarkably, our ICC was higher than the value (0.87) obtained for the original English version [20] and the range of 0.64-0.89 reported by several translated versions [31,32,[34][35][36][37][38]41,42] (Table 6). Additionally, the ICC values obtained for the urban and rural subgroups in the present study were also excellent and comparable to those obtained for the overall population.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Test-retest reliability of the Hausa-BBQ demonstrated a highly significant correlation (ICC = 0.91), suggesting acceptable reliability. Remarkably, our ICC was higher than the value (0.87) obtained for the original English version [20] and the range of 0.64-0.89 reported by several translated versions [31,32,[34][35][36][37][38]41,42] (Table 6). Additionally, the ICC values obtained for the urban and rural subgroups in the present study were also excellent and comparable to those obtained for the overall population.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Internal consistency calculated for the Hausa-BBQ (α = 0.78) was adequate considering the acceptable value of 0.70 [57]. Our alpha coefficient is slightly higher than the 0.70 reported for the original English measure [20], and the range of 0.67−0.77 reported by many language versions [31,32,34,36,37,42,43]. Other adaptations, however, reported slightly higher alpha coefficients (α range = 0.79-0.82) [33,35,38,39,40] (Table 6).…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 45%
See 3 more Smart Citations