2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2721-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural adaptation to Swedish and validation of the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) for pain, symptoms and physical function in patients with hip and groin disability due to femoro-acetabular impingement

Abstract: The Swedish version of the HAGOS is a valid, reliable and responsive instrument that can be used both for research and in the clinical setting at individual and group level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
72
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IRT-based analysis was not performed in the studies concerning HAGOS, IHOT-12 and IHOT-33, as these studies were developed using only CTT-based analyses 11 12 14 38 40 41 45 47. Unidimensionality and structural validity can, however, also be evaluated by CTT, and IRT is therefore not a pre-requisite for evaluating these methodological aspects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IRT-based analysis was not performed in the studies concerning HAGOS, IHOT-12 and IHOT-33, as these studies were developed using only CTT-based analyses 11 12 14 38 40 41 45 47. Unidimensionality and structural validity can, however, also be evaluated by CTT, and IRT is therefore not a pre-requisite for evaluating these methodological aspects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criterion validity was examined by analysing whether the results of the SEBT were consistent with the HAGOS, HSAS, VAS and Chair Stand Test. All of these measurements have good reliability and validity on hip patients (Jones et al, 1999;Katz & Melzack, 1999;Litcher-Kelly, Martino, Broderick, & Stone, 2007;Naal et al, 2013;Thomee et al, 2014;Thorborg et al, 2011) and both the HAGOS and HSAS have previously been tested on patients with FAI (Sreedharanunni et al, 2015;Thomee et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale was adjusted to hip-related disability by an expert panel and has been reported to have excellent test-retest reliability in both German and English, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.94 and 0.96, respectively, and acceptable content and construct validity (Naal et al, 2013). It has been adopted and translated into Swedish (Sansone et al, 2014;Thomee et al, 2014). In this study, the patients reported current and desired activity level.…”
Section: Patient-reported Hip and Groin Disability Was Measured By Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically, changes of 10 to 30 points can be measured at the individual level, depending on specific patient population and the subscale used. 91,95 Such changes also exceed the minimal important change, 91,95 and most athletes with groin pain will seek treatment when their HAGOS scores for sports-related function and participation/performance are less than 50 points on a 100-point scale, where 100 points indicates perfect function.…”
Section: Patient-reported Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%