2019
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1629651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in standard Arabic language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason may be found in the lack of a standardised protocol for this purpose [ 1 , 41 ]. Three methods were the most frequently used out of the different methods described: (1) the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire [ 33 ] scale due to its high reliability and validity, as well as its ability to be rendered and adapted to other languages [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]; (2) the electrophysiologic study on the velocity of the median nerve conduction according to the American Association of Electro-diagnostic Medicine (AAEM) guidelines [ 34 ]. While its proved objective validity, high specificity and sensitivity [ 47 ], some authors recommend to use it in addition to other instruments [ 5 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason may be found in the lack of a standardised protocol for this purpose [ 1 , 41 ]. Three methods were the most frequently used out of the different methods described: (1) the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire [ 33 ] scale due to its high reliability and validity, as well as its ability to be rendered and adapted to other languages [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]; (2) the electrophysiologic study on the velocity of the median nerve conduction according to the American Association of Electro-diagnostic Medicine (AAEM) guidelines [ 34 ]. While its proved objective validity, high specificity and sensitivity [ 47 ], some authors recommend to use it in addition to other instruments [ 5 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The latter was developed in 1993 as an objective tool to quantify symptoms and functional limitations brought about by the condition and has been reported as being more reliable in tracking the symptoms, progression, and recovery of the condition. 19 Indeed, it has undergone validation and psychometric analyses 20,21 to determine its appropriateness for the condition; has been validated and applied in Western, 20,22,23 Middle Eastern, 24 and Asian 25,26 populations; and has a strong test and retest validity and reliability. 27 However, it has never previously been tested as a screening tool, despite it asking for symptoms in a more structured and quantified manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire [34][35][36] Self-reported questionnaire assessing symptoms and functional impairment caused by carpal tunnel syndrome. 2 subscales with 6 items each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1-5, with 1 representing no symptoms and 5 representing the most severe symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%