Cross-cultural adaptation of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ’07) for the population of Polish children

Nowak, Agata

doi:10.1515/bhk-2016-0003

Cited by 9 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our results showed an extremely high reliability (0.94) for the whole questionnaire, which is consistent with the results of previous studies on reliability of this questionnaire (Girish, Raja, & Kamath, 2016;Hua et al, 2015;Nowak, 2016; where the Cronbach alpha is higher than 0.80.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Applicability of the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire for children in Serbia

Golubović¹,

Kalaba²,

Maksimović³

2018

Spec eduk i rehabilitacija

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim was to evaluate the applicability of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) adapted for use on the population of children in Serbia. The sample consisted of 901 children (age range 60-168 months) who did not have problems with coordination and the clinical sample of 58 children (age range 60-108 months). The parents assessed their child's coordination rating it on a 5-point Likert scale. Internal consistency of the instrument was 0.94, item-correlations were as high as over 0.70, test-retest reliability was good (r=0.97, p=0.00). The results revealed a significant positive correlation between the total questionnaire score and age (r=0.28, p=0.00). Factor analysis confirmed three-factor structure. The questionnaire had good sensitivity (98%) and specificity (78%). The DCDQ applied on Serbian children has a potential to be a reliable and valid instrument for screening children with coordination problems.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Applicability of the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire for children in Serbia

Golubović¹,

Kalaba²,

Maksimović³

2018

Spec eduk i rehabilitacija

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In line with previous studies, findings from this further validation work report higher internal consistency values for the DCDQ-ES total scale and for the three subscales [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Cronbach's alpha values in other validation studies in European, Asian and Latin American populations range from 0.89 to 0.96 [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], demonstrating that the DCDQ is a reliable tool for assessing motor coordination and probable DCD.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…The DCDQ is a three-dimensional, well-validated and easily accessible measure that was developed in Canada and is aimed at assessing motor performance during daily activities in children aged 5-15 years. In order to use it outside Canada, the DCDQ has been successfully cross-culturally adapted to several languages and countries, including Canadian and European French, German, Brazilian, Italian, Polish, Indi and Latin American Spanish [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric Validation and Reference Norms for the European Spanish Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire: DCDQ-ES

Montes-Montes

Delgado-Lobete

Pereira

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) is a widely used and well-validated tool that contributes to the diagnosis of Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). The aim of this study was to further analyze the psychometric properties of the European Spanish cross-culturally adapted version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ-ES) in a sample of Spanish children aged 6–11 years and to establish reference norms with respect to age groups. Parents of 540 typically developing children completed the DCDQ-ES. A second sample of 30 children with probable DCD (pDCD) was used to test its discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original three-factor structure and the internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s α = 0.907). Significant differences between age groups were found. The pDCD group scored significantly lower than the reference sample in the three subscales and DCDQ-ES total score (p < 0.001; AUC = 0.872). The DCDQ-ES is a reliable and valid tool for screening motor coordination difficulties in Spanish children and for identifying children with probable DCD. The findings of this research suggest that context-specific cut-off scores should be systematically utilized when using cross-cultural adaptations of the DCDQ. Age-specific cut-off scores for Spanish children are provided.

show abstract

“…Parents’ opinions have been found to correlate better with standardized clinical tests: e.g. concurrent validity between MABC and DCDQ r = .55 [ 64 ] and correlation between DCDQ and KTK r = 0.726 [ 65 ], but there has been found just moderate correlations with childrens’ options [ 66 , 67 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our review reflects some limitation of the studies included. With few exceptions [ 26 , 56 , 62 , 65 ] the study sizes were relatively small.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Early identification of children with motor difficulties, such as developmental coordination disorder (DCD), is essential. At present only a fraction of children with DCD are identified. The purpose of the study was to systematically review the literature from 1994 to 2017 on observational screening tools and to evaluate the validity, reliability and usability of the questionnaires used. Methods The review of the literature was conducted to synthesize the data from five electronic databases for children aged 6–12 years. The following databases were searched: Academic search Elite (EBSCO), ERIC (ProQuest), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (ProQuest), and SPORTDiscus with Full Text (EBSCO). The studies meeting our inclusion criteria were analyzed to assess the psychometric properties and feasibility of the measures. Results The literature search retrieved 1907 potentially relevant publications. The final number of studies that met the inclusion criteria of our systematic review was 45. There were 11 questionnaires for parents, teachers and children. None of the questionnaires was valid for population-based screening as the only measurement tool. Conclusions There are many challenges in using initial screening tools to identify children with motor difficulties. Nevertheless, many promising questionnaires are being developed that can provide information on functional skills and limitations across a variety of tasks and settings in the daily lives of children with DCD. The review provides much needed information about the current scales used in many clinical, educational and research settings. Implications for assessing psychometric properties of the developed questionnaires and further research are discussed. Trial registration PROSPERO, CRD42018087532 . Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ’07) for the population of Polish children

Cited by 9 publications

References 22 publications

Applicability of the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire for children in Serbia

Applicability of the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire for children in Serbia

Psychometric Validation and Reference Norms for the European Spanish Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire: DCDQ-ES

Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About