Cross‐cultural adaptation of a pre‐school screening instrument: comparison of Korean and US populations

Abstract

In general, the ASQ was translated with cultural appropriateness in mind and functioned as a valid and reliable parent-completed screening test to assist in early identification of young children with developmental delays. Further research is needed to confirm these results with a larger and more diverse Korean sample.

Universal developmental screening: preliminary studies in Galicia, Spain

“…These cut-off scores had to be used initially because this was the first time the ASQ had been used in Galicia. Although these Galician data are cautiously promising, there should be further research using Galicia-determined cut-off scores as was previously done in Norway (Richter & Janson, 2006), Taiwan (Tsai, McClelland, Pratt, & Squires, 2006) and Korea (Heo, Squires, & Yovanoff, 2008).…”

Neonatal Morbidities and Developmental Delay in Moderately Preterm-Born Children

“…18,19 Its reliability and validity have been documented in several studies. [19][20][21][22] The ASQ measures development in 5 domains: communication, fine motor, gross motor, problem-solving ability, and personal-social functioning. 18 The scores on each domain add up to an ASQ total-problems score.…”

The impact of a vocational education program for childcare providers on children's well-being

“…It is designed to be administered at 6-month intervals. The ASQ shows high levels of consistency, reliability, validity, and specificity (Squires, Bricker, & Twombly, 2004;Squires, Bricker, Heo, & Twombly, 2001) and has been used for early development assessments in numerous low-income and middle-to-low-income countries (Handal, Lozoff, Breilh, & Harlow, 2007;Heo, Squires, and Yovanoff, 2007;Tsai, McClelland, Pratt, & Squires, 2006).…”