Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hausa Version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a for Patients With Low Back Pain

Adamu, Aisha S; Ibrahim, Aminu A.; Ahmad, Rohiza; Akindele, Mukadas O.; Kaka, Bashir; Mukhtar, Naziru Bashir

doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000003068

Cited by 24 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It was not too low (i.e., lack of association between the items), nor too high (i.e., redundancy of some items) [40]. In comparison with previous reports, the internal consistency value of the Arabic-MODQ is higher than the value of the Persian-MODQ [38] (see Table 6), and comparable with the values of some validation studies of the ODQ (0.83-0.87) [13,17,19,20,[23][24][25]55,57,59].…”

Section: Plos Onesupporting

confidence: 82%

“…Floor and/or ceiling effects exist if more than 15% of respondents obtained the maximum or minimum possible score [40]. Floor and ceiling effects were defined by computing the number of respondents who scored the lowest status (90-100) or the highest status (0-10), respectively, on the Arabic-MODQ [13].…”

Section: Data Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.95 [40] Test-retest ICC > 0.70 [40] SEM � 2.15-6.5 [12,[20][21][22]27,32,34,50] MDC 95% � 6-13.67 [12,13,[20][21][22]27 The MIC was determined by locating the point on the curve nearest to the left-hand corner of the graph. This point is associated with the maximum sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire and represents a cutoff value to separate patients who have experienced improvements in their condition from those who have not [66].…”

Section: Internal Consistencymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) is used for evaluating the functional disability in patients with low back pain (LBP). However, the measurement characteristics of the MODQ among Arab patients are unknown. In this study, we aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the MODQ into Arabic and evaluate its psychometric properties. MethodsAn Arabic version of the MODQ was developed through forward translation, translation synthesis, and backward translation. Sixty-eight patients (55 males and 13 females) with a mean age 37.01 ± 7.57 years were recruited to assess its psychometric properties. Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test retest reliability (utilizing intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at 95% confidence level (MDC 95% ), and 95% limits of agreement (LOA). The construct validity was investigated by correlating the new translation with four other measures of LBP (using Spearman's rho). Finally, receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to compute the sensitivity, using the area under the curve (AUC), and the minimum important change (MIC). An alpha level of 0.05 was set for statistical tests and all the psychometric values were tested against a priori hypotheses. ResultsThe culturally aligned MODQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85). The ICC, SEM, MDC 95% , and LOA between baseline and two days later were 0.98, 1.60, 4.43, and -4.23 to 7.70, respectively, while the values between baseline and 14 days later were PLOS ONE PLOS ONE | https://doi.

show abstract

Section: Plos Onesupporting

confidence: 82%

Section: Data Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Internal Consistencymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A higher internal consistency > 0.95 would have indicated a redundancy in the questionnaire items. The internal consistencies of most of the ODI translations [37, 39, 40] fall within this band.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…The two-factor model in this study differs from the two-factor models reported by previous studies on the ODI. Such factors reported include social/ recreational activities and non-recreational activities [37], dynamic and static activities [46, 49], pain-related activity, and pain intensity and pain-related participation [39]. Further, the item loadings of the various two-factor models are dissimilar.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index

Mbada

Oguntoyinbo

Fasuyi³

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

37Introduction: Low Back Pain is a common public health problem worsened by 38 maladaptive beliefs and incongruent back pain behaviour. It is imperative to develop 39 outcome measures to assess these beliefs among patients with chronic LBP. This study 40 aimed to cross-culturally adapt and determine the psychometric properties of the 41 Yoruba version of the ODI (ODI-Y). 42Methods: The ODI-Y was cross-culturally adapted following the process involving 43 forward translation, synthesis, backward translation, expert review, and pilot testing. 44 One hundred and thirty-six patients with chronic LBP took part in the validation of the 45 ODI-Y; 86 of these individuals took part in the test-retest reliability (within 1-week 46 interval) of the translated instrument. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of 47 the ODI-Y were determined using the Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation. 48 Other psychometric properties explored included the factor structure and fit, convergent 49 validity, standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change. 50 Results: The mean age of the respondents was 50.5±10.6years. The ODI-Y showed a 51 high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha (α) of 0.81. Test-retest of the Yoruba 52 version of the ODI within 1-week interval yielded an Intra-Class Correlation coefficient 53 of 0.89. The ODI-Y yielded a two-factor structure which accounted for 51.7% of the 54 variance but showed poor fit. Convergent of ODI-Y with the visual analogue scale was 55 moderate (r=0.30; p=0.00). The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable 56 change of the ODI-Y were 2.0 and 5.5. 57 Conclusions: The ODI was adapted into the Yoruba language and proved to have a 58 good factor structure and psychometric properties that replicated the results of other 59 obtainable versions. We recommend it for use among Yoruba speaking patients with 60 low-back pain. 3 61 62

show abstract

The relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, pain and disability in low back pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Nzamba

Damme

Favre

et al. 2023

European Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and ObjectivesThe role of spinal movement alterations in low back pain (LBP) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta‐analyses examined the relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, disability and pain intensity in patients with LBP.Databases and Data TreatmentWe searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Pedro and Web of Science for relevant articles until 14th March 2023. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies Tool. We analysed the relationships between amplitude of movement, disability and pain intensity with standard correlational meta‐analyses and meta‐analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM) in cross‐sectional and longitudinal data.ResultsA total of 106 studies (9001 participants) were included. In cross‐sectional data, larger amplitude of movement was associated with lower disability (pooled coefficient: −0.25, 95% confidence interval: [−0.29 to −0.21]; 69/5899 studies/participants) and pain intensity (−0.13, [−0.17 to −0.09]; 74/5806). An increase in amplitude of movement was associated with a decrease in disability (−0.23, [−0.31 to −0.15]; 33/2437) and pain intensity (−0.25, [−0.33 to −0.17]; 38/2172) in longitudinal data. MASEM revealed similar results and, in addition, showed that amplitude of movement had a very small influence on the pain intensity–disability relationship.ConclusionsThese results showed a significant but small association between amplitude of movement and disability or pain intensity. Moreover, they demonstrated a direct association between an increase in amplitude of movement and a decrease in pain intensity or disability, supporting interventions aiming to reduce protective spinal movements in patients with LBP.SignificanceThe large meta‐analyses performed in this work revealed an association between reductions in spinal amplitude of movement and increased levels of disability and pain intensity in people with LBP. Moreover, it highlighted that LBP recovery is associated with a reduction in protective motor behaviour (increased amplitude of movement), supporting the inclusion of spinal movement in the biopsychosocial understanding and management of LBP.

show abstract

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Hausa Version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1a for Patients With Low Back Pain

Cited by 24 publications

References 54 publications

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index

The relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, pain and disability in low back pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About