2014
DOI: 10.2147/cia.s64853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability testing of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator for optimizing care of Polish patients with frailty syndrome

Abstract: BackgroundFrail older people are at high risk of developing adverse outcomes, such as disability, mortality, hospitalization, and institutionalization. Previous research suggests that the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring frailty. The aim of this study was to adapt and to test the reliability of the Polish version of the TFI.MethodA standard guideline was used for translation and cultural adaptation of the English version of the TFI into Polish. The study included… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gobbens et al identified the Cronbach's alpha values for the total TFI as 0.73, for the physical component as 0.70, for the psychological component as 0.63, and for the social component as 0.34, and these results are similar to those of our study (13). Our findings were similar to those of the study by Gobbens et al as well as validity-reliability studies conducted in other countries, and the total Cronbach's alpha value for the TFI varied between 0.66 and 0.78, for the physical component varied between 0.57 and 0.79, for the social component varied between 0.43 and 0.53, and for the TFI social component varied between 0.36 and 0.49 (5,17,20,22,23). In other validity-reliability studies of the TFI, the internal consistency of the social component was low, which is similar to the results of our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gobbens et al identified the Cronbach's alpha values for the total TFI as 0.73, for the physical component as 0.70, for the psychological component as 0.63, and for the social component as 0.34, and these results are similar to those of our study (13). Our findings were similar to those of the study by Gobbens et al as well as validity-reliability studies conducted in other countries, and the total Cronbach's alpha value for the TFI varied between 0.66 and 0.78, for the physical component varied between 0.57 and 0.79, for the social component varied between 0.43 and 0.53, and for the TFI social component varied between 0.36 and 0.49 (5,17,20,22,23). In other validity-reliability studies of the TFI, the internal consistency of the social component was low, which is similar to the results of our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The corrected item total correlations varied between 0.18 and 0.58 (21). The corrected item total correlations varied between 0.12 and 0.52 in the Polish validityreliability study, and it was stated that these values were >0.30 for all items in the Brazilian validity and reliability study (22,23). The German validityreliability study showed that the corrected item total correlations varied between −0.06 and 0.57 and that the "coping with problems" item exhibited negative correlation (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One reason might be the dichotomous response for mat, which does not create enough vari ance to distinguish between people. The corrected interitem correlations were comparable to the Polish TFI [25]. Anoth er reason might be that our samples were too fit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The orig inal version was developed in the Dutch language providing a good internal con sistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.73) and a retest reliability of 0.79 [15]. The instru ment has been crossculturally adapted into four languages English, Portuguese, Danish and Polish [1,15,21,25]. Frail ty as a concept is also recognized in Ger man aging research [8] and is most com monly assessed in geriatric settings com bining physiological measures, such as grip strength and gait analysis with psy chological and social markers.…”
Section: Frailty Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation