Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing of the Hindi Version of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation

Mehta, Saurabh P.; Mhatre, Bhavna; MacDermid, Joy C.; Mehta, Amita

doi:10.1016/j.jht.2011.08.001

Cited by 40 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The most important advantage of this questionnaire is that it is short and easy to complete. The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the PRWE have therefore been tested in many different populations [4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The PRWE questionnaire was modified to evaluate problems in the hand together with the wrist and was named the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation questionnaire

Topcu¹

2019

Turk J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (T-PRWHE) questionnaire for use in the Turkish patient population. Moreover, we aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the T-PRWHE questionnaire. Materials and methods: A total of 166 patients with hand and wrist problems were included in the study. They completed the T-PRWHE, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at baseline and at the 3rd month of the study. Reliability was evaluated by analyzing internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficient) and testretest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient). To analyze validity, factor analysis of the T-PRWHE and correlation coefficients between the T-PRWHE, DASH, and SF-36 were obtained. Results: Reliability of the T-PRWHE in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficients for T-PRWHE were found to be 0.85) was excellent. Intraclass correlation coefficients were over 0.90. The T-PRWHE has three factors and the correlations between the T-PRWHE and DASH and SF-36 were statistically significant. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, the Turkish version of the PRWHE questionnaire was found to be a valid and reliable scale and it is recommended for the evaluation of patient-based pain and disability level in routine clinical practice.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation questionnaire

Topcu¹

2019

Turk J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Reviews and discussions regarding translation and cultural adaptation: For item number 7, the term "Cut meat using a knife in my affected hand" was changed to "Cut meat/vegetable using knife by your affected hand". This term is highly dependent on the culture of that particular society so that even in the Indian version of the questionnaire, due to the low prevalence of meat consumption, this term was changed to "Cut vegetables using a knife with the affected hand" [20]; and in the Korean version this term was changed to "Cut food using a knife with the affected hand" because of the availability of presliced meat in this country [16].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, item number 10, the term "Carry a 10 Ib object in my affected hand", in accordance with the common measuring system here, was changed to "Carry a 5 kg object with your affected hand", similar to the Brazilian, Turkish, Korean, Indian, and German versions [15,16,19,20,21]. For item number 11, the term "Use bathroom tissue with my affected hand" was changed to "Clean yourself after toilet by hand/toilet paper with affected hand" in accordance with the beliefs and cultural issues in Iran.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This item was criticized in the German and Indian versions and in terms of physical, cultural and economical suitability, was not considered appropriate. Therefore, they had placed the option of not having to respond to this selected item [20,21]. Moreover, for item number 15, the term "Recreational activities" was changed to the term "Recreation and leisure activities", and the result of our work was similar to the Brazilian version of the questionnaire [15].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This questionnaire has been used for research in various countries. It's translation, validity and reliability has been tested such as Sweden, Netherlands, Brazil, Korea, China, Japan, Turkey, India, Germany, France and Finland; and the results have shown that this tool can be used as self-reported assessment for patients with a variety of wrist injuries [8,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Translation, Cultural Adaptation, Face and Content Validity of the Persian Version “Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation” (PRWE-Persian) Questionnaire

Fadavi-Ghaffari

Azad

Shariatzadeh

et al. 2017

Journal of Modern Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The following study was carried out in order to translate, cultural adaptation, and determine the content and face validity of the "Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation" questionnaire with the aim of evaluating the two components of pain and disability in patients with wrist injuries. Materials and Methods: The methodology of this survey was non-experimental study. After translation and cultural adaptation according to the Beaton method (approved by the American Surgeon Association), the pilot test was performed on patients with wrist injuries (fractures of the distal radius, scaphoid fractures and carpal tunnel syndrome). To assess content and face validity, the questionnaire was given to 10 specialists (6 of whom were occupational therapists, 2 were physiotherapists, and 2 were orthopaedic surgeons), and 20 patients with wrist injuries. Results: The qualitative content and face validity of the questionnaire for wrist injuries was appropriately reported good. Each item of the content validity ratio was slightly higher than 0.75 and this justified the necessity to include all items. Each item of the content validity index was slightly higher than 0.79. Therefore, all the items were approved in terms of their simplicity, clarity, and relevance. The impact score in order to evaluate the importance of each item was calculated and all were higher than 1.5. Therefore, in terms of face validity all the items were approved. Conclusion: The results showed that the Persian version of the "Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation" questionnaire for evaluating the pain and disability of wrist injuries was indeed satisfactory, in terms of it's content and face validity, thus it can be used in patients by specialists and therapists.

show abstract

Cross‑cultural adaptation, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (Thai PRWHE)

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing of the Hindi Version of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation

Cited by 40 publications

References 45 publications

Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation questionnaire

Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation questionnaire

Translation, Cultural Adaptation, Face and Content Validity of the Persian Version “Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation” (PRWE-Persian) Questionnaire

Cross‑cultural adaptation, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (Thai PRWHE)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About